PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VOTE vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VOTE vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VOTE achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.84% return.


VOTE

1D
0.53%
1M
-0.05%
6M
8.71%
YTD
10.03%
1Y
21.16%
3Y*
19.65%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.94%

VEA

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.27%
6M
7.42%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$674.44M$796.70M$806.62M
$1.77M$1.64M$2.40M

VOTE vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VOTE
TCW Transform 500 ETF
10.03%17.95%25.23%27.60%-19.74%11.77%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.84%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%0.29%

Correlation

The correlation between VOTE and VEA is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2021

0.77

The correlation between VOTE and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

VOTE vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VOTE
VEA

Technology

38.5%
18.4%

Financial Services

11.5%
23.1%

Communication Services

9.8%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
7.3%

Healthcare

9.0%
7.9%

Industrials

8.8%
17.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
5.3%

Energy

3.0%
4.5%

Utilities

2.1%
3.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
6.9%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.5%

Technology

VOTE
38.5%
VEA
18.4%

Financial Services

VOTE
11.5%
VEA
23.1%

Communication Services

VOTE
9.8%
VEA
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VOTE
9.5%
VEA
7.3%

Healthcare

VOTE
9.0%
VEA
7.9%

Industrials

VOTE
8.8%
VEA
17.9%

Consumer Defensive

VOTE
4.4%
VEA
5.3%

Energy

VOTE
3.0%
VEA
4.5%

Utilities

VOTE
2.1%
VEA
3.1%

Basic Materials

VOTE
1.7%
VEA
6.9%

Real Estate

VOTE
1.7%
VEA
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VOTE vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VOTE
VOTE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VOTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VOTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VOTE vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VOTEVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.53

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.96

9.44

-0.48

VOTE vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VOTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VOTE and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VOTE vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VOTE drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VOTE and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VOTEVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.71%

-60.68%

+34.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.10%

-11.63%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.08%

-13.45%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.71%

-29.71%

+4.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-2.45%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-13.20%

+7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

3.10%

-0.95%

Volatility

VOTE vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Transform 500 ETF (VOTE) is 3.59%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that VOTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VOTEVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

5.40%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

15.40%

-5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

17.25%

-4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

16.84%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.08%

17.21%

-0.13%

VOTE vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VOTE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VOTE vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

VOTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than VEA's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.57%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%
VOTE
TCW Transform 500 ETF
0.94%1.03%1.18%1.33%1.54%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VOTE and VEA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to VOTE (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VOTE dropped -25.71% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 5-year performance, VOTE leads with 12.43% vs 9.76% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOTE has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOTE has performed better with a 12.43% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for VOTE.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.94% for VOTE.

VOTE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VOTE tracks Morningstar US Large Cap Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VOTE and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VOTE and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer