PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. XES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 32.26% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 53.45% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has outperformed XES with an annualized return of 9.99%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -3.10% annualized return.


XLE

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
32.26%
6M
29.34%
1Y
47.98%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
20.45%
10Y*
9.99%

XES

1D
1.83%
1M
-2.53%
YTD
53.45%
6M
44.81%
1Y
103.89%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
14.16%
10Y*
-3.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.26%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
53.45%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and XES is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2006

0.87

The correlation between XLE and XES shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLE vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
XES

Energy

100.0%
97.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

2.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XLE
100.0%
XES
97.5%

Basic Materials

XLE

-

XES

-

Communication Services

XLE

-

XES

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

XES

-

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

XES

-

Financial Services

XLE

-

XES

-

Healthcare

XLE

-

XES

-

Industrials

XLE

-

XES
2.5%

Real Estate

XLE

-

XES

-

Technology

XLE

-

XES

-

Utilities

XLE

-

XES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLEXESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.51

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

10.62

-6.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

28.49

-16.89

XLE vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is lower than the XES Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and XES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLEXESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

3.46

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.36

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

-0.07

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.07

+0.38

Drawdowns

XLE vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and XES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEXESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-95.65%

+24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-9.84%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-45.95%

+25.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-45.95%

+19.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-91.23%

+24.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-70.37%

+64.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-54.36%

+36.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

3.66%

+0.49%

Volatility

XLE vs. XES - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) have volatilities of 8.25% and 8.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEXESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

8.46%

-0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.51%

20.57%

-4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.50%

30.28%

-9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

39.05%

-13.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

45.03%

-15.45%

XLE vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLE vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than XES's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.10%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and XES have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to XLE (8.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs XES's -95.65%.

On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.99% vs -3.10% for XES. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.99% return vs -3.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XES.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.10% for XES.

XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.35% for XES.

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and XES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer