XLE vs. SPYG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.99%/yr vs 18.16%/yr for SPYG. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.

Performance

XLE vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 32.26% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 13.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 9.99%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.16% annualized return.

XLE

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -1.18%
• YTD: 32.26%
• 6M: 29.34%
• 1Y: 47.98%
• 3Y*: 17.74%
• 5Y*: 20.45%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

SPYG

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 6.54%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 6M: 13.08%
• 1Y: 33.66%
• 3Y*: 28.20%
• 5Y*: 16.07%
• 10Y*: 18.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	32.26%	7.88%	5.56%	-0.63%	64.32%	53.28%	-32.67%	11.74%	-18.22%	-0.89%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	13.73%	22.09%	35.99%	30.02%	-29.41%	32.01%	33.46%	30.84%	-0.12%	27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and SPYG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2000	0.46

The correlation between XLE and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLE vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLE	SPYG
Energy	100.0%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	0.3%
Communication Services	-	16.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.0%
Financial Services	-	8.5%
Healthcare	-	5.8%
Industrials	-	5.0%
Real Estate	-	0.6%
Technology	-	51.9%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

XLE vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE

XLE Risk / Return Rank: 70
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 65

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 60
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLE	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.11	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.88	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.37	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	2.46	+1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.60	10.17	+1.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLE vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLE	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.11	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79	0.76	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.88	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.35	-0.04

Drawdowns

XLE vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and SPYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLE	SPYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.26%	-67.63%	-3.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.05%	-13.76%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.14%	-22.14%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.04%	-32.67%	+6.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.81%	-32.67%	-34.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.09%	-1.15%	-4.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.98%	-24.32%	+6.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.15%	3.32%	+0.83%

Volatility

XLE vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 4.34%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLE	SPYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.25%	4.34%	+3.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.51%	12.46%	+4.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.50%	16.06%	+4.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.01%	21.16%	+4.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.58%	20.64%	+8.94%

XLE vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLE vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.47%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.54%	3.28%	3.36%	3.55%	3.68%	4.21%	5.62%	6.72%	3.54%	3.03%	2.26%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLE and SPYG in my portfolio?

XLE and SPYG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLE or SPYG?

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to SPYG (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

Which ETF is better, XLE or SPYG?

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.16% vs 9.99% for XLE. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLE or SPYG?

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.16% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLE or SPYG?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLE or SPYG?

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.

What is the main difference between XLE and SPYG?

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.04% for SPYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.