XLE vs. SPYG
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.80%/yr vs 17.77%/yr for SPYG. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
XLE vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.95% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 14.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 9.80%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.77% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- 29.95%
- 1Y
- 38.22%
- 3Y*
- 13.23%
- 5Y*
- 22.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.71%
SPYG
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 17.86%
- YTD
- 14.87%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.88%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $396.67M | $305.79M | $315.86M | |
| $1.81B | $1.78B | $1.93B |
XLE vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.95% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 14.87% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and SPYG is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000 | 0.46 |
The correlation between XLE and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLE vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
SPYG
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLE
SPYG
Basic Materials
XLE
-
SPYG
Communication Services
XLE
-
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
SPYG
Financial Services
XLE
-
SPYG
Healthcare
XLE
-
SPYG
Industrials
XLE
-
SPYG
Real Estate
XLE
-
SPYG
Technology
XLE
-
SPYG
Utilities
XLE
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
SPYG
XLE vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.25 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 1.86 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 6.77 | +0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -67.63% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -13.76% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -22.14% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -32.67% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -32.67% | -34.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.73% | -0.21% | -7.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.93% | -24.19% | +6.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.64% | 3.78% | +1.86% |
Volatility
XLE vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 6.16%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 6.59% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.48% | 15.03% | +1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 18.25% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.76% | 21.56% | +4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 20.82% | +8.76% |
XLE vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLE vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than SPYG's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.65% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and SPYG have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to XLE (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 17.77% vs 9.80% for XLE. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 6.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 17.77% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.47% for SPYG.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.04% for SPYG.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer