XLE vs. NOC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while NOC (Northrop Grumman Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.91%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for NOC. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XLE vs. NOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than NOC's -2.75% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed NOC with an annualized return of 9.91%, while NOC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.

XLE

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 29.56%
• 6M: 28.37%
• 1Y: 37.19%
• 3Y*: 16.18%
• 5Y*: 20.12%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

NOC

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: -2.75%
• 6M: -2.67%
• 1Y: 12.44%
• 3Y*: 8.64%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 11.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. NOC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	29.56%	7.88%	5.56%	-0.63%	64.32%	53.28%	-32.67%	11.74%	-18.22%	-0.89%
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation	-2.75%	23.61%	1.93%	-12.79%	43.02%	29.29%	-9.92%	42.69%	-18.95%	33.88%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and NOC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998	0.31

The correlation between XLE and NOC shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XLE vs. NOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE

XLE Risk / Return Rank: 61
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

NOC

NOC Risk / Return Rank: 54
NOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
NOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
NOC Omega Ratio Rank: 52
NOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
NOC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. NOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLE	NOC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	0.47	+1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	0.87	+1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.11	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	0.40	+2.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.63	1.02	+7.62

XLE vs. NOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the NOC Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and NOC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLE vs. NOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, roughly equal to the maximum NOC drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and NOC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLE	NOC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.26%	-71.12%	-0.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.05%	-31.20%	+19.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.14%	-31.20%	+11.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.04%	-31.20%	+5.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.81%	-36.38%	-30.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	-28.03%	+20.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.97%	-18.40%	+0.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	12.25%	-7.93%

Volatility

XLE vs. NOC - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Northrop Grumman Corporation (NOC) have volatilities of 7.26% and 7.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLE	NOC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	7.39%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.79%	21.25%	-4.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.57%	26.55%	-5.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.05%	25.28%	+0.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.58%	25.42%	+4.16%

Dividends

XLE vs. NOC - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than NOC's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NOC Northrop Grumman Corporation	1.71%	1.58%	1.72%	1.57%	1.24%	1.59%	1.86%	1.50%	1.92%	1.27%	1.50%	1.64%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.59%	3.28%	3.36%	3.55%	3.68%	4.21%	5.62%	6.72%	3.54%	3.03%	2.26%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLE and NOC in my portfolio?

XLE and NOC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLE or NOC?

NOC has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to XLE (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs NOC's -71.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.