XLC vs. VGT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLC returned 8.03%/yr vs 20.35%/yr for VGT. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLC charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.

Performance

XLC vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return.

XLC

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -4.38%
• YTD: -4.85%
• 6M: -3.59%
• 1Y: 9.07%
• 3Y*: 21.60%
• 5Y*: 8.03%
• 10Y*: —

VGT

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 24.03%
• 6M: 24.13%
• 1Y: 47.99%
• 3Y*: 29.84%
• 5Y*: 20.35%
• 10Y*: 25.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLC vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund	-4.85%	23.08%	34.71%	52.82%	-37.63%	15.96%	26.90%	31.05%	-16.45%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	24.03%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	48.62%	-11.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XLC and VGT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between XLC and VGT has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLC vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLC	VGT
Communication Services	95.1%	0.5%
Technology	4.7%	98.5%
Basic Materials	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.3%
Financial Services	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	0.0%
Industrials	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLC vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLC

XLC Risk / Return Rank: 22
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 24

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 70
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLC vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLC	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	2.19	-1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	2.74	-1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.36	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.86	2.94	-2.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.73	9.11	-6.38

XLC vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLC and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLC vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLC	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.65%	-54.63%	+7.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.57%	-16.40%	+5.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.97%	-27.23%	+9.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.65%	-35.07%	-11.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.72%	-7.18%	+0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.58%	-7.95%	-2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.33%	5.28%	-1.95%

Volatility

XLC vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is 3.57%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that XLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLC	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	10.00%	-6.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.65%	18.00%	-8.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.28%	22.00%	-8.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.68%	25.40%	-4.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.17%	24.72%	-2.55%

XLC vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLC vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.33%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund	1.25%	1.13%	0.99%	0.82%	1.10%	0.74%	0.68%	0.82%	0.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLC and VGT in my portfolio?

XLC and VGT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLC or VGT?

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to XLC (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs VGT's -54.63%.

Which ETF is better, XLC or VGT?

On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 20.35% vs 8.03% for XLC. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLC or VGT?

Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 20.35% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLC or VGT?

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLC or VGT?

XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

What is the main difference between XLC and VGT?

XLC is categorized as Communications Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.09% for VGT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.