PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLC vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLC vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -4.49% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.


XLC

1D
-1.31%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
-4.49%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
11.67%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLC vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
-4.49%23.08%34.71%52.82%-37.63%15.96%26.90%14.25%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between XLC and BBUS is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.81

The correlation between XLC and BBUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLC vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLC
BBUS

Communication Services

95.1%
10.8%

Technology

4.7%
37.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.2%

Financial Services

-

10.8%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

7.2%

Real Estate

-

1.7%

Utilities

-

2.6%

Communication Services

XLC
95.1%
BBUS
10.8%

Technology

XLC
4.7%
BBUS
37.1%

Basic Materials

XLC

-

BBUS
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XLC

-

BBUS
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

XLC

-

BBUS
4.5%

Energy

XLC

-

BBUS
3.2%

Financial Services

XLC

-

BBUS
10.8%

Healthcare

XLC

-

BBUS
8.1%

Industrials

XLC

-

BBUS
7.2%

Real Estate

XLC

-

BBUS
1.7%

Utilities

XLC

-

BBUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLC vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLC
XLC Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLC vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLCBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.42

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.00

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

13.76

-10.03

XLC vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLC and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLCBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.33

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.79

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.84

-0.30

Drawdowns

XLC vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than BBUS's maximum drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-35.35%

-11.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-9.21%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.97%

-19.01%

+1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.65%

-25.46%

-21.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.36%

-0.74%

-5.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.60%

-5.46%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.00%

+1.14%

Volatility

XLC vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that XLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

2.88%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

8.96%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.26%

11.87%

+1.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.68%

17.03%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.20%

19.59%

+2.61%

XLC vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLC vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.25%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLC and BBUS have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLC has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 8.28% for XLC. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.

XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.

XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLC and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer