XJH vs. TLT
XJH (iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XJH is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJH returned 7.22%/yr vs -6.37%/yr for TLT. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XJH charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
XJH vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJH achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.56% return.
XJH
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 11.87%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- —
TLT
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -1.32%
- 1Y
- 2.88%
- 3Y*
- -2.03%
- 5Y*
- -6.37%
- 10Y*
- -1.63%
XJH vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 11.87% | 8.12% | 12.27% | 16.74% | -14.36% | 23.43% | 29.59% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -0.56% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | -4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJH and TLT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.06 |
The correlation between XJH and TLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJH vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
XJH
TLT
XJH vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XJH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.06 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 0.38 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 0.94 | +8.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XJH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 0.30 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | -0.40 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.25 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
XJH vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJH drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJH and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -48.35% | +23.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -7.58% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -19.18% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | -43.70% | +18.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.05% | -40.61% | +38.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.82% | -13.82% | +7.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 3.07% | -0.46% |
Volatility
XJH vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.65%. This indicates that XJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJH | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.49% | 2.65% | +1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 6.51% | +5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 9.66% | +6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 15.85% | +4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 14.90% | +4.99% |
XJH vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJH has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XJH vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
XJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than TLT's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.60% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.12% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 1.04% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XJH and TLT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XJH has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to TLT (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJH dropped -25.07% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 5-year performance, XJH leads with 7.22% vs -6.37% for TLT. On fees, XJH is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XJH has performed better with a 7.22% return vs -6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XJH is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.
TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 1.12% for XJH.
XJH is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. XJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJH and 0.15% for TLT.
XJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XJH and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer