PortfoliosLab logo
XJH vs. XMMO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XJH and XMMO is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

XJH vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

XJH:

11.12%

XMMO:

24.48%

Max Drawdown

XJH:

-0.49%

XMMO:

-55.37%

Current Drawdown

XJH:

-0.18%

XMMO:

-11.54%

Returns By Period


XJH

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XMMO

YTD

-2.51%

1M

10.33%

6M

-7.63%

1Y

4.49%

5Y*

18.14%

10Y*

14.73%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XJH vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJH has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XJH vs. XMMO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XJH is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XJH is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XJH is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XJH is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XJH is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XJH is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XMMO is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XMMO is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XMMO is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XMMO is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XMMO is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XMMO is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XJH vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

XJH vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

XJH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
XJH
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.51%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%1.24%

Drawdowns

XJH vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJH drawdown since its inception was -0.49%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJH and XMMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XJH vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...