XJH vs. XMMO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO).
XJH and XMMO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2020. XMMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. Both XJH and XMMO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XJH or XMMO.
Correlation
The correlation between XJH and XMMO is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XJH vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XJH:
0.77
XMMO:
1.16
XJH:
1.19
XMMO:
1.74
XJH:
1.14
XMMO:
1.21
XJH:
1.38
XMMO:
2.43
XJH:
3.21
XMMO:
5.72
XJH:
3.85%
XMMO:
3.95%
XJH:
16.07%
XMMO:
19.54%
XJH:
-25.07%
XMMO:
-55.37%
XJH:
-6.39%
XMMO:
-7.81%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJH achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 1.60% return.
XJH
1.92%
-3.22%
4.81%
13.23%
N/A
N/A
XMMO
1.60%
-5.38%
7.33%
24.51%
15.28%
15.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XJH vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJH has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XJH vs. XMMO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
XJH
XMMO
XJH vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XJH vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
XJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than XMMO's 0.33% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.24% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 1.04% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.33% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% | 1.24% |
Drawdowns
XJH vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJH drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJH and XMMO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XJH vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) is 3.46%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that XJH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.