XJH vs. IJH
XJH (iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and IJH (iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - XJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index while IJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJH returned 7.71%/yr vs 8.32%/yr for IJH. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XJH charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IJH.
Performance
XJH vs. IJH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XJH having a 13.92% return and IJH slightly higher at 14.24%.
XJH
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 3.61%
- YTD
- 13.92%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 27.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- —
IJH
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 15.27%
- 1Y
- 27.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
XJH vs. IJH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 13.92% | 8.12% | 12.27% | 16.74% | -14.36% | 23.43% | 29.59% |
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 14.24% | 7.42% | 13.92% | 16.40% | -13.11% | 24.72% | 29.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJH and IJH is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020 | 0.99 |
The correlation between XJH and IJH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
XJH vs. IJH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XJH
IJH
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
XJH
IJH
Technology
XJH
IJH
Financial Services
XJH
IJH
Consumer Cyclical
XJH
IJH
Healthcare
XJH
IJH
Real Estate
XJH
IJH
Basic Materials
XJH
IJH
Consumer Defensive
XJH
IJH
Energy
XJH
IJH
Utilities
XJH
IJH
Communication Services
XJH
IJH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJH vs. IJH — Risk / Return Rank
XJH
IJH
XJH vs. IJH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XJH | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 1.76 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 2.55 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.06 | -0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 11.22 | -0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XJH | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.76 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.42 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.46 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
XJH vs. IJH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJH drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, smaller than the maximum IJH drawdown of -55.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJH and IJH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJH | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.07% | -55.07% | +30.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -8.83% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -24.10% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.07% | -24.10% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -7.57% | +0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 2.41% | +0.20% |
Volatility
XJH vs. IJH - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) at 4.44%. This indicates that XJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJH | IJH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 4.44% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | 11.34% | +0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 15.54% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 19.74% | +0.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 21.18% | -1.29% |
XJH vs. IJH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJH has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IJH's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XJH vs. IJH - Dividend Comparison
XJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than IJH's 1.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJH iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.18% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.46% | 1.68% | 1.18% | 1.28% | 1.63% | 1.72% | 1.19% | 1.60% | 1.56% |
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.10% | 1.24% | 1.24% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 1.04% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, XJH and IJH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XJH has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to IJH (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJH dropped -25.07% vs IJH's -55.07%.
On 5-year performance, IJH leads with 8.32% vs 7.71% for XJH. On fees, IJH is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IJH has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IJH has performed better with a 8.32% return vs 7.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJH is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XJH.
IJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.10% for XJH.
XJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index, while IJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJH and 0.05% for IJH.
IJH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XJH and IJH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer