XJH vs. MDY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY).
XJH and MDY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XJH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2020. MDY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on May 4, 1995. Both XJH and MDY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XJH or MDY.
Key characteristics
| XJH | MDY | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.60% | 4.62% |
| 1Y Return | 18.92% | 19.85% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.34% | 3.20% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.03 | 1.08 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.53% | 16.23% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.07% | -55.33% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.07% | -4.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJH and MDY is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XJH vs. MDY - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XJH achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than MDY's 4.62% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XJH vs. MDY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJH has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than MDY's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XJH vs. MDY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XJH vs. MDY - Dividend Comparison
XJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than MDY's 1.13% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.45% | 1.04% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.13% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% | 1.17% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
XJH vs. MDY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJH drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, smaller than the maximum MDY drawdown of -55.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJH and MDY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XJH vs. MDY - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.