XJH vs. CVMC

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

XJH (iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and CVMC (Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - XJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index while CVMC tracks the Russell Midcap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XJH returned 14.70%/yr vs 15.54%/yr for CVMC. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XJH charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CVMC.

Performance

XJH vs. CVMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJH achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than CVMC's 13.48% return.

XJH

• 1D: -2.05%
• 1M: -0.88%
• YTD: 11.87%
• 6M: 11.82%
• 1Y: 24.57%
• 3Y*: 14.70%
• 5Y*: 7.22%
• 10Y*: —

CVMC

• 1D: -2.33%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 13.48%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 23.71%
• 3Y*: 15.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJH vs. CVMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	11.87%	8.12%	12.27%	4.85%
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	13.48%	9.52%	12.57%	4.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XJH and CVMC is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.96

The correlation between XJH and CVMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJH vs. CVMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XJH	CVMC
Industrials	25.9%	20.6%
Technology	16.0%	20.9%
Financial Services	14.8%	13.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	10.0%
Healthcare	9.6%	10.1%
Real Estate	8.2%	7.1%
Basic Materials	4.9%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	5.5%
Energy	2.9%	1.1%
Utilities	1.6%	6.0%
Communication Services	1.1%	2.9%

Return for Risk

XJH vs. CVMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJH

XJH Risk / Return Rank: 49
XJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
XJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
XJH Omega Ratio Rank: 42
XJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
XJH Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CVMC

CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 55
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 50
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJH vs. CVMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XJH	CVMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.69	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	2.47	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	2.55	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.44	10.23	-0.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XJH vs. CVMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the CVMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJH and CVMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XJH	CVMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	1.69	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.73	0.00

Drawdowns

XJH vs. CVMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJH drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, which is greater than CVMC's maximum drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJH and CVMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	XJH	CVMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.07%	-22.53%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-9.35%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.56%	-22.53%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-2.33%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.82%	-4.18%	-2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	2.32%	+0.29%

Volatility

XJH vs. CVMC - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XJH	CVMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	4.34%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.07%	10.79%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.39%	14.11%	+2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.94%	16.49%	+3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.89%	16.49%	+3.40%

XJH vs. CVMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJH has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CVMC's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XJH vs. CVMC - Dividend Comparison

XJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than CVMC's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	1.19%	1.39%	1.21%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XJH iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF	1.12%	1.24%	1.24%	1.38%	1.45%	1.04%	0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XJH and CVMC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, XJH and CVMC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XJH or CVMC?

XJH has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to CVMC (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJH dropped -25.07% vs CVMC's -22.53%.

Which ETF is better, XJH or CVMC?

On 3-year performance, CVMC leads with 15.54% vs 14.70% for XJH. On fees, XJH is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, CVMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XJH or CVMC?

Over the 3-year period, CVMC has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 14.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XJH or CVMC?

XJH is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XJH or CVMC?

CVMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 1.12% for XJH.

What is the main difference between XJH and CVMC?

XJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index, while CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Calvert. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJH and 0.15% for CVMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.