CVMC vs. NUMG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CVMC (Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) and NUMG (Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CVMC is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index, while NUMG is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CVMC returned 16.51%/yr vs 6.44%/yr for NUMG. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CVMC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NUMG.

Performance

CVMC vs. NUMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 17.15% return, which is significantly higher than NUMG's -5.49% return.

CVMC

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 4.77%
• YTD: 17.15%
• 6M: 15.44%
• 1Y: 28.32%
• 3Y*: 16.51%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NUMG

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: -5.49%
• 6M: -7.45%
• 1Y: -3.64%
• 3Y*: 6.44%
• 5Y*: -0.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CVMC vs. NUMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	17.15%	9.52%	12.57%	6.14%
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-5.49%	0.78%	11.99%	9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMC and NUMG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023	0.87

The correlation between CVMC and NUMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CVMC vs. NUMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CVMC	NUMG
Technology	23.4%	33.4%
Industrials	19.9%	24.6%
Financial Services	12.2%	6.4%
Healthcare	10.0%	13.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.7%	10.6%
Real Estate	6.8%	3.1%
Utilities	5.4%	1.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	-
Basic Materials	2.9%	2.0%
Communication Services	2.7%	5.2%
Energy	1.2%	-

Return for Risk

CVMC vs. NUMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVMC

CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 63
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 69

NUMG

NUMG Risk / Return Rank: 7
NUMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
NUMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
NUMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVMC vs. NUMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CVMC	NUMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	-0.20	+2.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	-0.15	+3.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.98	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	-0.19	+3.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.18	-0.47	+12.65

CVMC vs. NUMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the NUMG Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMC and NUMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CVMC vs. NUMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum NUMG drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and NUMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	CVMC	NUMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.53%	-38.85%	+16.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.35%	-19.71%	+10.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.53%	-26.58%	+4.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-13.97%	+13.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.14%	-11.37%	+7.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	7.76%	-5.43%

Volatility

CVMC vs. NUMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) is 5.05%, while Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF (NUMG) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that CVMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CVMC	NUMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.05%	6.31%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.15%	15.15%	-4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.48%	18.66%	-4.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	22.94%	-6.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	21.87%	-5.32%

CVMC vs. NUMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NUMG's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CVMC vs. NUMG - Dividend Comparison

CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than NUMG's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CVMC Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	1.45%	1.39%	1.21%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NUMG Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.06%	0.18%	0.18%	12.76%	3.82%	0.27%	5.14%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CVMC and NUMG in my portfolio?

CVMC and NUMG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CVMC or NUMG?

NUMG has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to CVMC (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMC dropped -22.53% vs NUMG's -38.85%.

Which ETF is better, CVMC or NUMG?

On 3-year performance, CVMC leads with 16.51% vs 6.44% for NUMG. On fees, CVMC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CVMC has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CVMC or NUMG?

Over the 3-year period, CVMC has performed better with a 16.51% return vs 6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CVMC or NUMG?

CVMC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUMG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CVMC or NUMG?

CVMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.01% for NUMG.

What is the main difference between CVMC and NUMG?

CVMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while NUMG is Mid Cap Growth Equities. CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index, while NUMG tracks MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid Cap Growth. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.30% for NUMG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.