PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVMC vs. FLQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CVMC vs. FLQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CVMC vs. FLQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
0.08%9.52%12.57%4.40%
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
-2.14%5.16%14.32%8.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 0.08% return, which is significantly higher than FLQM's -2.14% return.


CVMC

1D
2.84%
1M
-6.16%
YTD
0.08%
6M
1.53%
1Y
14.43%
3Y*
10.84%
5Y*
10Y*

FLQM

1D
1.55%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-2.14%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CVMC vs. FLQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FLQM's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CVMC vs. FLQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CVMC
CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FLQM
FLQM Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FLQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLQM Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FLQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLQM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CVMC vs. FLQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CVMCFLQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.73

0.30

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

0.56

+0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

0.48

+0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.92

1.96

+2.96

CVMC vs. FLQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is higher than the FLQM Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMC and FLQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CVMCFLQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

0.30

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.56

-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between CVMC and FLQM is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CVMC vs. FLQM - Dividend Comparison

CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than FLQM's 1.56% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
1.35%1.39%1.21%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLQM
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF
1.56%1.49%1.28%1.27%1.33%1.05%1.10%1.37%1.42%1.15%

Drawdowns

CVMC vs. FLQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum FLQM drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and FLQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CVMCFLQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-37.26%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.14%

-12.77%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-6.06%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-4.95%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.12%

-0.09%

Volatility

CVMC vs. FLQM - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (FLQM) at 3.73%. This indicates that CVMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CVMCFLQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

3.73%

+2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

8.94%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.89%

17.46%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

16.44%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

18.60%

-2.06%