PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CVMC vs. ESGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CVMC vs. ESGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CVMC achieves a 18.88% return, which is significantly higher than ESGV's 9.66% return.


CVMC

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.69%
6M
15.14%
YTD
18.88%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.48%

ESGV

1D
0.68%
1M
0.09%
6M
9.06%
YTD
9.66%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$208.77K$235.08K$243.94K
$15.60M$18.04M$25.74M

CVMC vs. ESGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
18.88%9.52%12.57%6.14%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
9.66%16.48%24.69%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between CVMC and ESGV is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.82

The correlation between CVMC and ESGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

CVMC vs. ESGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CVMC
ESGV

Industrials

20.1%
4.2%

Technology

17.3%
43.1%

Financial Services

15.7%
11.9%

Healthcare

12.8%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
11.2%

Real Estate

7.8%
2.6%

Utilities

5.8%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
3.7%

Basic Materials

3.0%
2.0%

Communication Services

2.8%
11.2%

Energy

0.3%
0.0%

Industrials

CVMC
20.1%
ESGV
4.2%

Technology

CVMC
17.3%
ESGV
43.1%

Financial Services

CVMC
15.7%
ESGV
11.9%

Healthcare

CVMC
12.8%
ESGV
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CVMC
9.2%
ESGV
11.2%

Real Estate

CVMC
7.8%
ESGV
2.6%

Utilities

CVMC
5.8%
ESGV
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

CVMC
5.2%
ESGV
3.7%

Basic Materials

CVMC
3.0%
ESGV
2.0%

Communication Services

CVMC
2.8%
ESGV
11.2%

Energy

CVMC
0.3%
ESGV
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CVMC vs. ESGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CVMC
CVMC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CVMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVMC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CVMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVMC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CVMC vs. ESGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) and Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CVMCESGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

1.65

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.74

6.66

+4.08

CVMC vs. ESGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CVMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is higher than the ESGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CVMC and ESGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CVMC vs. ESGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CVMC drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, smaller than the maximum ESGV drawdown of -33.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVMC and ESGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CVMCESGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-33.66%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.35%

-11.60%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.53%

-20.41%

-2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.85%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-6.34%

+2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

2.87%

-0.56%

Volatility

CVMC vs. ESGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVMC) is 3.11%, while Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that CVMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CVMCESGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.11%

4.17%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

11.64%

-0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

14.59%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.37%

18.52%

-2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.37%

20.52%

-4.15%

CVMC vs. ESGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CVMC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGV's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CVMC vs. ESGV - Dividend Comparison

CVMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than ESGV's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CVMC
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF
1.18%1.39%1.21%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.87%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


CVMC and ESGV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGV has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to CVMC (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CVMC dropped -22.53% vs ESGV's -33.66%.

On 3-year performance, ESGV leads with 19.06% vs 14.66% for CVMC. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CVMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 19.06% return vs 14.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CVMC.

CVMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.87% for ESGV.

CVMC is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while ESGV is Large Cap Blend Equities. CVMC tracks Russell Midcap Index, while ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: Calvert and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CVMC and 0.09% for ESGV.

CVMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CVMC and ESGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer