XITK vs. SMH
XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XITK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XITK returned 14.35%/yr vs 37.68%/yr for SMH. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
XITK vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 77.13% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 14.35%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.68% annualized return.
XITK
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 12.45%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 11.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.58%
- 5Y*
- -0.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.35%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 25.87%
- YTD
- 77.13%
- 6M
- 75.61%
- 1Y
- 157.20%
- 3Y*
- 64.17%
- 5Y*
- 39.21%
- 10Y*
- 37.68%
XITK vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 13.97% | 2.53% | 19.12% | 45.87% | -47.45% | -11.24% | 90.22% | 36.98% | 7.60% | 36.01% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 77.13% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between XITK and SMH is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XITK and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XITK vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XITK
SMH
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XITK
SMH
Communication Services
XITK
SMH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XITK
SMH
-
Industrials
XITK
SMH
-
Financial Services
XITK
SMH
-
Healthcare
XITK
SMH
-
Real Estate
XITK
SMH
-
Basic Materials
XITK
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
XITK
-
SMH
-
Energy
XITK
-
SMH
-
Utilities
XITK
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XITK vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
XITK
SMH
XITK vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XITK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.72 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 10.59 | -10.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | 40.63 | -39.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XITK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 5.19 | -4.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 1.13 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 1.16 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.34 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
XITK vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XITK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.56% | -84.96% | +19.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.03% | -14.93% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -35.74% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.53% | -45.30% | -16.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.56% | -45.30% | -20.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.29% | 0.00% | -22.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.08% | -41.09% | +19.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.96% | 3.89% | +8.07% |
Volatility
XITK vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) is 8.59%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that XITK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XITK | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.59% | 11.47% | -2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.87% | 24.29% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.50% | 30.56% | -4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.63% | 35.01% | -2.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.57% | 32.57% | -3.00% |
XITK vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XITK vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XITK and SMH have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to XITK (8.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.68% vs 14.35% for XITK. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XITK has been the lower-risk option at 8.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.68% return vs 14.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.17%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.
XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XITK and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer