XITK vs. QQQ
XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XITK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XITK returned 13.96%/yr vs 22.36%/yr for QQQ. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
XITK vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.89% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 13.96%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.36% annualized return.
XITK
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- -0.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.32%
- 5Y*
- -4.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 33.02%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 16.13%
- 10Y*
- 22.36%
XITK vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 1.90% | 2.53% | 19.12% | 45.87% | -47.45% | -11.24% | 90.22% | 36.98% | 7.60% | 36.01% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.89% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between XITK and QQQ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between XITK and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
XITK vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XITK
QQQ
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XITK
QQQ
Communication Services
XITK
QQQ
Healthcare
XITK
QQQ
Industrials
XITK
QQQ
Financial Services
XITK
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
XITK
QQQ
Real Estate
XITK
QQQ
Basic Materials
XITK
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
XITK
-
QQQ
Energy
XITK
-
QQQ
Utilities
XITK
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XITK vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
XITK
QQQ
XITK vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XITK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.33 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 2.77 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 10.21 | -10.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XITK vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XITK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.56% | -82.97% | +17.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.03% | -11.96% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -22.77% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.53% | -35.12% | -26.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.56% | -35.12% | -30.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.52% | -3.89% | -26.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -32.72% | +10.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.17% | 3.24% | +8.93% |
Volatility
XITK vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 9.02%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XITK | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.20% | 9.02% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.82% | 14.55% | +9.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.92% | 17.91% | +10.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 22.69% | +10.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 22.41% | +7.30% |
XITK vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
XITK vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XITK and QQQ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XITK has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to QQQ (9.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.36% vs 13.96% for XITK. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 9.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.36% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XITK.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.
XITK is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XITK and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer