XIACY vs. SMH
XIACY (Xiaomi Corporation) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 5 years, XIACY returned -0.46%/yr vs 36.57%/yr for SMH. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XIACY vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XIACY achieves a -30.57% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 57.98% return.
XIACY
- 1D
- 5.68%
- 1M
- 7.23%
- 6M
- -28.44%
- YTD
- -30.57%
- 1Y
- -52.28%
- 3Y*
- 34.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- 6M
- 43.52%
- YTD
- 57.98%
- 1Y
- 97.28%
- 3Y*
- 53.38%
- 5Y*
- 36.57%
- 10Y*
- 35.15%
XIACY vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation | -30.57% | 15.23% | 118.16% | 45.75% | -42.42% | -35.46% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 57.98% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 23.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XIACY and SMH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XIACY vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
XIACY
SMH
XIACY vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XIACY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.41 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 6.54 | -7.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.40 | 20.41 | -21.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XIACY vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XIACY drawdown since its inception was -71.03%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XIACY and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XIACY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.03% | -84.96% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.59% | -14.95% | -48.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.97% | -35.74% | -29.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.06% | -45.30% | -24.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.70% | -14.95% | -40.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.69% | -40.93% | +1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.39% | 4.78% | +32.61% |
Volatility
XIACY vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xiaomi Corporation (XIACY) is 13.51%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 17.01%. This indicates that XIACY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XIACY | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.51% | 17.01% | -3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.30% | 31.61% | -3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.84% | 36.97% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.63% | 36.21% | +10.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.47% | 33.16% | +13.31% |
Dividends
XIACY vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
XIACY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.19% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
XIACY Xiaomi Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XIACY and SMH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (17.01%) compared to XIACY (13.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XIACY dropped -71.03% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XIACY and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer