PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHS vs. PTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XHS vs. PTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHS achieves a 25.67% return, which is significantly higher than PTH's 16.97% return. Over the past 10 years, XHS has underperformed PTH with an annualized return of 9.33%, while PTH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.93% annualized return.


XHS

1D
1.12%
1M
-2.57%
6M
24.75%
YTD
25.67%
1Y
52.87%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
9.33%
ALL TIME*
12.70%

PTH

1D
0.06%
1M
-4.00%
6M
17.80%
YTD
16.97%
1Y
59.64%
3Y*
17.56%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
13.93%
ALL TIME*
10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.43M$6.30M$2.60M
$3.18M$3.55M$3.01M

XHS vs. PTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHS
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF
25.67%18.83%1.76%5.15%-19.87%9.76%33.66%18.81%1.96%17.65%
PTH
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF
16.97%27.91%2.36%-4.54%-20.61%-3.20%67.26%34.45%-1.23%50.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XHS and PTH is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between XHS and PTH has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XHS vs. PTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XHS
PTH

Healthcare

98.3%
100.0%

Financial Services

1.7%
1.2%

Industrials

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XHS
98.3%
PTH
100.0%

Financial Services

XHS
1.7%
PTH
1.2%

Industrials

XHS
0.5%
PTH

-

Basic Materials

XHS

-

PTH

-

Communication Services

XHS

-

PTH

-

Consumer Cyclical

XHS

-

PTH

-

Consumer Defensive

XHS

-

PTH

-

Energy

XHS

-

PTH

-

Real Estate

XHS

-

PTH

-

Technology

XHS

-

PTH

-

Utilities

XHS

-

PTH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHS vs. PTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XHS
XHS Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
XHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
XHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PTH
PTH Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTH Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XHS vs. PTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XHSPTHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.39

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.43

5.00

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

12.34

+3.16

XHS vs. PTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHS Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the PTH Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHS and PTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XHS vs. PTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHS drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum PTH drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHS and PTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHSPTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-53.52%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.99%

-11.98%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-27.51%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.30%

-50.07%

+18.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.32%

-53.52%

+14.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-5.74%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.10%

-16.92%

+6.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

4.85%

-1.43%

Volatility

XHS vs. PTH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) is 4.70%, while Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a volatility of 8.55%. This indicates that XHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHSPTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

8.55%

-3.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.31%

20.08%

-7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.51%

24.92%

-7.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.24%

25.74%

-4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.42%

27.40%

-4.98%

XHS vs. PTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XHS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PTH's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XHS vs. PTH - Dividend Comparison

XHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than PTH's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTH
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF
2.63%3.07%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XHS
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF
0.20%0.27%0.38%0.23%0.19%0.20%0.23%2.37%0.34%0.22%0.28%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


XHS and PTH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTH has higher volatility (8.55%) compared to XHS (4.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHS dropped -39.32% vs PTH's -53.52%.

On 10-year performance, PTH leads with 13.93% vs 9.33% for XHS. On fees, XHS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHS has been the lower-risk option at 4.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTH has performed better with a 13.93% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XHS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.

PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 0.20% for XHS.

XHS is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while PTH is Momentum. XHS tracks S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index, while PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XHS and 0.60% for PTH.

XHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.04 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHS and PTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer