PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XHR vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XHR vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHR achieves a 26.81% return, which is significantly higher than MAR's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, XHR has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 4.49%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 19.66% annualized return.


XHR

1D
1.37%
1M
6.28%
YTD
26.81%
6M
32.36%
1Y
55.24%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
4.49%

MAR

1D
-0.85%
1M
5.50%
YTD
20.95%
6M
23.16%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
29.47%
5Y*
22.61%
10Y*
19.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHR vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
26.81%-0.71%12.72%6.71%-26.13%19.14%-27.75%32.33%-15.96%17.61%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
20.95%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XHR and MAR is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015

0.58

The correlation between XHR and MAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

XHR:

$0.93

MAR:

$12.66

PE Ratio

XHR:

19.18

MAR:

29.53

PEG Ratio

XHR:

0.30

MAR:

0.77

PS Ratio

XHR:

1.19

MAR:

3.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

XHR:

$1.08B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XHR:

-$63.01M

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

XHR:

$201.50M

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XHR vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHR
XHR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XHR Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XHR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHR vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XHRMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

1.71

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.82

2.61

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.39

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.35

8.53

+0.82

XHR vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHR Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHR and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XHRMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

1.71

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.79

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

0.60

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.47

-0.41

Drawdowns

XHR vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHR drawdown since its inception was -71.02%, smaller than the maximum MAR drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHR and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XHRMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.02%

-75.59%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-12.65%

-3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.47%

-30.50%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.28%

-30.50%

-20.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.02%

-61.26%

-9.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.44%

-3.14%

-8.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.14%

-14.91%

-11.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

5.03%

+0.45%

Volatility

XHR vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 7.01%. This indicates that XHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XHRMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

7.01%

+2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.94%

20.04%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.73%

26.12%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.55%

28.82%

+5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.47%

32.88%

+9.59%

Dividends

XHR vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

XHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than MAR's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.73%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
3.15%3.96%3.23%2.94%1.52%0.00%1.81%5.09%6.40%5.09%5.66%5.45%

Financials

XHR vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
295.41M
1.81B
(XHR) Total Revenue
(MAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


XHR and MAR have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XHR has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to MAR (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHR dropped -71.02% vs MAR's -75.59%.

XHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XHR and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer