XHR vs. IRGJX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XHR (Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.) is a stock, while IRGJX (Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio) is Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Voya. Over the past 10 years, XHR returned 4.49%/yr vs 12.28%/yr for IRGJX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XHR vs. IRGJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) and Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRGJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XHR achieves a 26.81% return, which is significantly higher than IRGJX's 4.96% return. Over the past 10 years, XHR has underperformed IRGJX with an annualized return of 4.49%, while IRGJX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.28% annualized return.

XHR

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 26.81%
• 6M: 32.36%
• 1Y: 55.24%
• 3Y*: 16.55%
• 5Y*: 0.67%
• 10Y*: 4.49%

IRGJX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 5.50%
• YTD: 4.96%
• 6M: 4.50%
• 1Y: 8.10%
• 3Y*: 16.21%
• 5Y*: 6.77%
• 10Y*: 12.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XHR vs. IRGJX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XHR Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.	26.81%	-0.71%	12.72%	6.71%	-26.13%	19.14%	-27.75%	32.33%	-15.96%	17.61%
IRGJX Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio	4.96%	8.53%	21.54%	25.34%	-26.82%	12.16%	34.60%	34.39%	-5.13%	24.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XHR and IRGJX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015	0.47

The correlation between XHR and IRGJX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XHR vs. IRGJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XHR

XHR Risk / Return Rank: 84
XHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
XHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XHR Omega Ratio Rank: 81
XHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XHR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

IRGJX

IRGJX Risk / Return Rank: 16
IRGJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
IRGJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
IRGJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
IRGJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
IRGJX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XHR vs. IRGJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) and Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRGJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XHR	IRGJX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	0.64	+1.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	1.00	+1.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.12	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	2.10	+1.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.35	6.17	+3.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XHR vs. IRGJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XHR Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the IRGJX Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XHR and IRGJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XHR	IRGJX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.01	0.64	+1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02	0.30	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	0.56	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.67	-0.61

Drawdowns

XHR vs. IRGJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XHR drawdown since its inception was -71.02%, which is greater than IRGJX's maximum drawdown of -38.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XHR and IRGJX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XHR	IRGJX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.02%	-38.65%	-32.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.23%	-14.85%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.47%	-25.37%	-17.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.28%	-38.65%	-12.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-71.02%	-38.65%	-32.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.44%	-1.06%	-10.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.14%	-6.83%	-19.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.48%	5.05%	+0.43%

Volatility

XHR vs. IRGJX - Volatility Comparison

Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (XHR) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio (IRGJX) at 4.07%. This indicates that XHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRGJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XHR	IRGJX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.87%	4.07%	+5.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.94%	12.78%	+7.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.73%	16.72%	+11.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.55%	23.10%	+11.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.47%	22.09%	+20.38%

Dividends

XHR vs. IRGJX - Dividend Comparison

XHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than IRGJX's 13.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IRGJX Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio	13.35%	14.29%	0.35%	0.42%	12.03%	3.55%	5.50%	10.03%	13.76%	0.83%	0.96%	0.91%
XHR Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.	3.15%	3.96%	3.23%	2.94%	1.52%	0.00%	1.81%	5.09%	6.40%	5.09%	5.66%	5.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XHR and IRGJX in my portfolio?

XHR and IRGJX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XHR or IRGJX?

XHR has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to IRGJX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XHR dropped -71.02% vs IRGJX's -38.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.