XFLX vs. XNAV

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV).

XFLX and XNAV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XFLX is an actively managed fund by FundX. It was launched on Jul 1, 2002. XNAV is an actively managed fund by FundX. It was launched on Jul 1, 2002.

Performance

XFLX vs. XNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XFLX vs. XNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF	-0.27%	2.56%	4.01%	3.90%
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	2.30%	13.61%	25.44%	9.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFLX achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than XNAV's 2.30% return.

XFLX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: -1.46%
• YTD: -0.27%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 2.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XNAV

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -5.64%
• YTD: 2.30%
• 6M: 5.66%
• 1Y: 27.67%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFLX vs. XNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFLX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAV's 1.30% expense ratio.

XNAV

FundX Aggressive ETF

XFLX

FundX Flexible ETF

Return for Risk

XFLX vs. XNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFLX

XFLX Risk / Return Rank: 23
XFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
XFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
XFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
XFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
XFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

XNAV

XNAV Risk / Return Rank: 73
XNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
XNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
XNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 72
XNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFLX vs. XNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XFLX	XNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	1.36	-0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	1.91	-1.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.28	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	2.18	-1.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.08	9.08	-7.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XFLX vs. XNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the XNAV Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFLX and XNAV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XFLX	XNAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44	1.36	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.88	1.01	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between XFLX and XNAV is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XFLX vs. XNAV - Dividend Comparison

XFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.82%, more than XNAV's 0.57% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF	9.82%	9.80%	4.55%	4.05%	0.00%
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	0.57%	0.58%	0.09%	1.21%	1.47%

Drawdowns

XFLX vs. XNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFLX drawdown since its inception was -6.54%, smaller than the maximum XNAV drawdown of -24.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLX and XNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFLX	XNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-24.27%	+17.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.97%	-12.99%	+8.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-7.03%	+5.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-3.70%	+2.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	3.11%	-1.89%

Volatility

XFLX vs. XNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) is 2.12%, while FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that XFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XFLX	XNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.12%	7.78%	-5.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.85%	13.63%	-10.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.28%	20.40%	-15.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.74%	18.76%	-14.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.74%	18.76%	-14.02%