XFLX vs. XNAV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XFLX (FundX Flexible ETF) and XNAV (FundX Aggressive ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XFLX is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by FundX, while XNAV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by FundX. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XFLX returned 4.36% vs 37.02% for XNAV. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XFLX charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for XNAV.

Performance

XFLX vs. XNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFLX achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than XNAV's 17.83% return.

XFLX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 4.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XNAV

• 1D: -4.01%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 17.83%
• 6M: 16.41%
• 1Y: 37.02%
• 3Y*: 22.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFLX vs. XNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF	1.14%	2.56%	4.01%	3.90%
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	17.83%	13.61%	25.44%	10.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XFLX and XNAV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2023	0.63

The correlation between XFLX and XNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XFLX vs. XNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFLX

XFLX Risk / Return Rank: 36
XFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
XFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
XFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
XFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

XNAV

XNAV Risk / Return Rank: 68
XNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
XNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
XNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
XNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFLX vs. XNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XFLX	XNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	2.00	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	2.58	-0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.36	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	3.24	-1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	12.83	-7.10

XFLX vs. XNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the XNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFLX and XNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XFLX vs. XNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFLX drawdown since its inception was -6.54%, smaller than the maximum XNAV drawdown of -24.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLX and XNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFLX	XNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-24.27%	+17.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	-11.47%	+8.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-5.36%	+4.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.94%	-3.58%	+2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	2.89%	-2.13%

Volatility

XFLX vs. XNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) is 1.07%, while FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) has a volatility of 9.39%. This indicates that XFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XFLX	XNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	9.39%	-8.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.10%	16.05%	-12.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.63%	18.57%	-14.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.68%	19.15%	-14.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.68%	19.15%	-14.47%

XFLX vs. XNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFLX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAV's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XFLX vs. XNAV - Dividend Comparison

XFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than XNAV's 0.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF	9.69%	9.80%	4.55%	4.05%	0.00%
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	0.49%	0.58%	0.09%	1.21%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XFLX and XNAV in my portfolio?

XFLX and XNAV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XFLX or XNAV?

XNAV has higher volatility (9.39%) compared to XFLX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFLX dropped -6.54% vs XNAV's -24.27%.

Which ETF is better, XFLX or XNAV?

On 1-year performance, XNAV leads with 37.02% vs 4.36% for XFLX. On fees, XFLX is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, XFLX has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XFLX or XNAV?

Over the 1-year period, XNAV has performed better with a 37.02% return vs 4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XFLX or XNAV?

XFLX is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for XNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XFLX or XNAV?

XFLX has the higher dividend yield at 9.69%, compared with 0.49% for XNAV.

What is the main difference between XFLX and XNAV?

XFLX is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while XNAV is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for XFLX and 1.30% for XNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.