XFLX vs. VGMS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XFLX (FundX Flexible ETF) and VGMS (Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XFLX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VGMS.

Performance

XFLX vs. VGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XFLX having a 1.39% return and VGMS slightly higher at 1.43%.

XFLX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.39%
• 6M: 1.49%
• 1Y: 5.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VGMS

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFLX vs. VGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF	1.39%	3.49%
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF	1.43%	5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XFLX and VGMS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

XFLX vs. VGMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFLX

XFLX Risk / Return Rank: 40
XFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
XFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
XFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFLX vs. VGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XFLX	VGMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.83	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XFLX	VGMS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.97	2.25	-1.29

Drawdowns

XFLX vs. VGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFLX drawdown since its inception was -6.54%, which is greater than VGMS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLX and VGMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFLX	VGMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-2.46%	-4.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.03%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.95%	-0.31%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XFLX	VGMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52%	3.19%	+0.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.70%	3.19%	+1.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.70%	3.19%	+1.51%

XFLX vs. VGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFLX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VGMS's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XFLX vs. VGMS - Dividend Comparison

XFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, more than VGMS's 5.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF	5.14%	2.94%	0.00%	0.00%
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF	9.66%	9.80%	4.55%	4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XFLX and VGMS in my portfolio?

XFLX and VGMS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XFLX or VGMS?

On fees, VGMS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XFLX or VGMS?

VGMS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for XFLX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XFLX or VGMS?

XFLX has the higher dividend yield at 9.66%, compared with 5.14% for VGMS.

What is the main difference between XFLX and VGMS?

They also come from different issuers: FundX and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for XFLX and 0.30% for VGMS.