XNAV vs. XCOR

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XNAV (FundX Aggressive ETF) and XCOR (Fundx ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from FundX. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNAV returned 17.14%/yr vs 18.28%/yr for XCOR. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for XCOR.

Performance

XNAV vs. XCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) and Fundx ETF (XCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNAV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than XCOR's 7.10% return.

XNAV

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -4.93%
• 6M: 3.57%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 1Y: 24.44%
• 3Y*: 17.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.54%

XCOR

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: -1.70%
• 6M: 5.73%
• YTD: 7.10%
• 1Y: 17.83%
• 3Y*: 18.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
XCOR Fundx ETF	$35.41K	$53.25K	$135.69K
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	$19.79K	$35.20K	$45.41K

XNAV vs. XCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	9.30%	13.61%	25.44%	16.11%	8.67%
XCOR Fundx ETF	7.10%	12.50%	29.57%	14.34%	8.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XNAV and XCOR is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2022	0.95

The correlation between XNAV and XCOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

XNAV vs. XCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XNAV	XCOR
Technology	51.9%	51.1%
Industrials	11.3%	8.8%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	9.0%
Communication Services	6.1%	11.3%
Energy	5.3%	2.2%
Basic Materials	4.9%	0.9%
Financial Services	4.7%	6.3%
Healthcare	3.7%	6.0%
Utilities	2.6%	0.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	2.9%
Real Estate	0.5%	0.7%

Return for Risk

XNAV vs. XCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XNAV

XNAV Risk / Return Rank: 44
XNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
XNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 43
XNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 47

XCOR

XCOR Risk / Return Rank: 44
XCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
XCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
XCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
XCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
XCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XNAV vs. XCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) and Fundx ETF (XCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XNAV	XCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.07	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	1.55	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.19	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	1.65	-0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.52	5.83	-0.32

XNAV vs. XCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the XCOR Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAV and XCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XNAV vs. XCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAV drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, which is greater than XCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAV and XCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNAV	XCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.27%	-22.54%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.26%	-10.10%	-6.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.27%	-22.54%	-1.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.21%	-6.24%	-5.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-3.16%	-0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	2.85%	+1.37%

Volatility

XNAV vs. XCOR - Volatility Comparison

FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) has a higher volatility of 8.71% compared to Fundx ETF (XCOR) at 6.63%. This indicates that XNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNAV	XCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.71%	6.63%	+2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.33%	13.36%	+4.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.76%	15.59%	+5.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.53%	17.39%	+2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.53%	17.39%	+2.14%

XNAV vs. XCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XCOR's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNAV vs. XCOR - Dividend Comparison

XNAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than XCOR's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
XCOR Fundx ETF	0.40%	0.43%	0.00%	0.95%	2.52%
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	0.53%	0.58%	0.09%	1.21%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNAV and XCOR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, XNAV and XCOR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XNAV or XCOR?

XNAV has higher volatility (8.71%) compared to XCOR (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNAV dropped -24.27% vs XCOR's -22.54%.

Which ETF is better, XNAV or XCOR?

On 3-year performance, XCOR leads with 18.28% vs 17.14% for XNAV. On fees, XCOR is cheaper at 1.27% per year. On volatility, XCOR has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XNAV or XCOR?

Over the 3-year period, XCOR has performed better with a 18.28% return vs 17.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNAV or XCOR?

XCOR is cheaper with a 1.27% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for XNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XNAV or XCOR?

XNAV has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.40% for XCOR.

What is the main difference between XNAV and XCOR?

Their fees differ too: 1.30% for XNAV and 1.27% for XCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.