XNAV vs. XCOR
XNAV (FundX Aggressive ETF) and XCOR (Fundx ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from FundX. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNAV returned 25.53%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for XCOR. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for XCOR.
Performance
XNAV vs. XCOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XNAV achieves a 24.50% return, which is significantly higher than XCOR's 14.23% return.
XNAV
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 24.50%
- 6M
- 26.25%
- 1Y
- 45.35%
- 3Y*
- 25.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCOR
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 7.60%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 30.67%
- 3Y*
- 23.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNAV vs. XCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF | 24.50% | 13.61% | 25.44% | 16.11% | 7.03% |
XCOR Fundx ETF | 14.23% | 12.50% | 29.57% | 14.34% | 7.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XNAV and XCOR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between XNAV and XCOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
XNAV vs. XCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XNAV
XCOR
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
XNAV
XCOR
Industrials
XNAV
XCOR
Financial Services
XNAV
XCOR
Basic Materials
XNAV
XCOR
Energy
XNAV
XCOR
Consumer Cyclical
XNAV
XCOR
Communication Services
XNAV
XCOR
Consumer Defensive
XNAV
XCOR
Healthcare
XNAV
XCOR
Utilities
XNAV
XCOR
Real Estate
XNAV
XCOR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XNAV vs. XCOR — Risk / Return Rank
XNAV
XCOR
XNAV vs. XCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) and Fundx ETF (XCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XNAV | XCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.76 | 2.40 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.57 | 3.29 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.43 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 3.28 | +0.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.04 | 14.50 | +2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XNAV | XCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.76 | 2.40 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
XNAV vs. XCOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XNAV drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, which is greater than XCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAV and XCOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XNAV | XCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.27% | -22.54% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.47% | -9.60% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.27% | -22.54% | -1.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -3.12% | -0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 2.17% | +0.56% |
Volatility
XNAV vs. XCOR - Volatility Comparison
FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to Fundx ETF (XCOR) at 3.75%. This indicates that XNAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XNAV | XCOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 3.75% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 10.15% | +3.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.55% | 12.83% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 17.05% | +1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 17.05% | +1.69% |
XNAV vs. XCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XCOR's 1.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
XNAV vs. XCOR - Dividend Comparison
XNAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than XCOR's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCOR Fundx ETF | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.95% | 2.52% |
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.09% | 1.21% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XNAV and XCOR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XNAV has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to XCOR (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNAV dropped -24.27% vs XCOR's -22.54%.
On 3-year performance, XNAV leads with 25.53% vs 23.23% for XCOR. On fees, XCOR is cheaper at 1.27% per year. On volatility, XCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XNAV has performed better with a 25.53% return vs 23.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XCOR is cheaper with a 1.27% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for XNAV.
XNAV has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.37% for XCOR.
Their fees differ too: 1.30% for XNAV and 1.27% for XCOR.
XNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XNAV and XCOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer