XFLX vs. CGMS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XFLX (FundX Flexible ETF) and CGMS (Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XFLX returned 4.36% vs 5.89% for CGMS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XFLX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for CGMS.

Performance

XFLX vs. CGMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XFLX achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly lower than CGMS's 1.54% return.

XFLX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 1.14%
• 6M: 1.26%
• 1Y: 4.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGMS

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 5.89%
• 3Y*: 8.00%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XFLX vs. CGMS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF	1.14%	2.56%	4.01%	3.90%
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF	1.54%	7.52%	7.24%	8.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XFLX and CGMS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2023	0.81

The correlation between XFLX and CGMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XFLX vs. CGMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XFLX

XFLX Risk / Return Rank: 36
XFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
XFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
XFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
XFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

CGMS

CGMS Risk / Return Rank: 54
CGMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CGMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CGMS Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CGMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
CGMS Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XFLX vs. CGMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XFLX	CGMS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	1.69	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	2.54	-0.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	2.39	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	10.60	-4.87

XFLX vs. CGMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XFLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the CGMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XFLX and CGMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XFLX vs. CGMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XFLX drawdown since its inception was -6.54%, which is greater than CGMS's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XFLX and CGMS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XFLX	CGMS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.54%	-4.08%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	-2.47%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.47%	-0.40%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.94%	-0.66%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	0.56%	+0.20%

Volatility

XFLX vs. CGMS - Volatility Comparison

FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) and Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF (CGMS) have volatilities of 1.07% and 1.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XFLX	CGMS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	1.12%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.10%	2.78%	+0.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.63%	3.50%	+0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.68%	5.12%	-0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.68%	5.12%	-0.44%

XFLX vs. CGMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XFLX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CGMS's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

XFLX vs. CGMS - Dividend Comparison

XFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.69%, more than CGMS's 6.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGMS Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF	6.09%	6.00%	5.91%	5.84%	0.97%
XFLX FundX Flexible ETF	9.69%	9.80%	4.55%	4.05%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XFLX and CGMS in my portfolio?

XFLX and CGMS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XFLX or CGMS?

CGMS has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to XFLX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XFLX dropped -6.54% vs CGMS's -4.08%.

Which ETF is better, XFLX or CGMS?

On 1-year performance, CGMS leads with 5.89% vs 4.36% for XFLX. On fees, CGMS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XFLX or CGMS?

Over the 1-year period, CGMS has performed better with a 5.89% return vs 4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XFLX or CGMS?

CGMS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for XFLX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XFLX or CGMS?

XFLX has the higher dividend yield at 9.69%, compared with 6.09% for CGMS.

What is the main difference between XFLX and CGMS?

They also come from different issuers: FundX and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for XFLX and 0.39% for CGMS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.