PortfoliosLab logo
XNAV vs. EAOA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XNAV and EAOA is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

XNAV vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

XNAV:

3.74%

EAOA:

4.82%

Max Drawdown

XNAV:

-0.18%

EAOA:

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

XNAV:

0.00%

EAOA:

-0.03%

Returns By Period


XNAV

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

EAOA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XNAV vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

XNAV vs. EAOA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XNAV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XNAV is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XNAV is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XNAV is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XNAV is 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XNAV is 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XNAV is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EAOA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EAOA is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EAOA is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EAOA is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EAOA is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EAOA is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EAOA is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XNAV vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

XNAV vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

XNAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while EAOA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022
XNAV
FundX Aggressive ETF
0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EAOA
iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XNAV vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAV drawdown since its inception was -0.18%, smaller than the maximum EAOA drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAV and EAOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

XNAV vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...