XNAV vs. DRIV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XNAV (FundX Aggressive ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XNAV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by FundX, while DRIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index. XNAV is actively managed, while DRIV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XNAV returned 17.14%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for DRIV. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XNAV charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.

Performance

XNAV vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNAV achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 13.15% return.

XNAV

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: -4.93%
• 6M: 3.57%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 1Y: 24.44%
• 3Y*: 17.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.54%

DRIV

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -9.07%
• 6M: 4.15%
• YTD: 13.15%
• 1Y: 42.10%
• 3Y*: 8.06%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	$934.15K	$1.60M	$2.79M
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	$19.79K	$35.20K	$45.41K

XNAV vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	9.30%	13.61%	25.44%	16.11%	8.67%
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	13.15%	30.42%	-5.04%	26.14%	3.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XNAV and DRIV is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2022	0.81

The correlation between XNAV and DRIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.91 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XNAV vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XNAV	DRIV
Technology	51.9%	40.9%
Industrials	11.3%	17.5%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	23.8%
Communication Services	6.1%	6.3%
Energy	5.3%	-
Basic Materials	4.9%	11.5%
Financial Services	4.7%	-
Healthcare	3.7%	-
Utilities	2.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

XNAV vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XNAV

XNAV Risk / Return Rank: 44
XNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
XNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 43
XNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
XNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 47

DRIV

DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 52
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 54
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XNAV vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XNAV	DRIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	1.37	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	1.87	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.24	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	1.63	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.52	5.83	-0.31

XNAV vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNAV Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNAV and DRIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XNAV vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNAV drawdown since its inception was -24.27%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNAV and DRIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	XNAV	DRIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.27%	-41.93%	+17.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.26%	-24.70%	+8.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.27%	-30.71%	+6.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.21%	-21.29%	+9.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-15.09%	+11.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	6.90%	-2.68%

Volatility

XNAV vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FundX Aggressive ETF (XNAV) is 8.71%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 10.68%. This indicates that XNAV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XNAV	DRIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.71%	10.68%	-1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.33%	24.70%	-6.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.76%	29.45%	-8.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.53%	27.92%	-8.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.53%	27.76%	-8.23%

XNAV vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNAV has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNAV vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

XNAV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than DRIV's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	0.66%	1.07%	2.07%	1.62%	1.24%	0.32%	0.29%	1.23%	2.79%
XNAV FundX Aggressive ETF	0.53%	0.58%	0.09%	1.21%	1.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XNAV and DRIV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, XNAV and DRIV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XNAV or DRIV?

DRIV has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to XNAV (8.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNAV dropped -24.27% vs DRIV's -41.93%.

Which ETF is better, XNAV or DRIV?

On 3-year performance, XNAV leads with 17.14% vs 8.06% for DRIV. On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, XNAV has been the lower-risk option at 8.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XNAV or DRIV?

Over the 3-year period, XNAV has performed better with a 17.14% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XNAV or DRIV?

DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for XNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XNAV or DRIV?

DRIV has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.53% for XNAV.

What is the main difference between XNAV and DRIV?

XNAV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DRIV is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: FundX and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for XNAV and 0.68% for DRIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.