XES vs. XLV
XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XES is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XES returned -3.86%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for XLV. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XES charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
XES vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 38.89% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed XLV with an annualized return of -3.86%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.57% annualized return.
XES
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -14.10%
- YTD
- 38.89%
- 6M
- 42.06%
- 1Y
- 69.29%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- -3.86%
XLV
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 6M
- -2.77%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 5.91%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
XES vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 38.89% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -3.09% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XES and XLV is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XES and XLV has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XES vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XES
XLV
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XES
XLV
-
Industrials
XES
XLV
-
Basic Materials
XES
-
XLV
-
Communication Services
XES
-
XLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
XES
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
XES
-
XLV
-
Financial Services
XES
-
XLV
-
Healthcare
XES
-
XLV
Real Estate
XES
-
XLV
-
Technology
XES
-
XLV
-
Utilities
XES
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XES vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
XES
XLV
XES vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XES | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.17 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.63 | 1.36 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.82 | 3.22 | +13.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XES vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XES | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.65% | -39.17% | -56.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.03% | -10.47% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.95% | -17.11% | -28.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -17.11% | -28.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.23% | -28.40% | -62.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.18% | -6.36% | -66.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.39% | -7.12% | -47.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 4.40% | -0.23% |
Volatility
XES vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.08%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XES | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 5.08% | +5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.77% | 10.55% | +10.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.20% | 15.02% | +16.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.07% | 14.76% | +24.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.98% | 16.58% | +28.40% |
XES vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XES vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than XLV's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.22% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.68% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XES and XLV have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XES has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to XLV (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.57% vs -3.86% for XES. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.57% return vs -3.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XES.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.22% for XES.
XES is categorized as Energy Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.08% for XLV.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XES and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer