XLV vs. IXJ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) and IXJ (iShares Global Healthcare ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - XLV tracks the Health Care Select Sector Index while IXJ tracks the S&P Global 1200 Health Care (Sector) Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLV returned 9.81%/yr vs 8.22%/yr for IXJ. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XLV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXJ.

Performance

XLV vs. IXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly higher than IXJ's 3.85% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has outperformed IXJ with an annualized return of 9.81%, while IXJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.

XLV

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -0.73%
• 6M: 5.94%
• YTD: 5.90%
• 1Y: 26.13%
• 3Y*: 8.60%
• 5Y*: 5.93%
• 10Y*: 9.81%
• ALL TIME*: 8.63%

IXJ

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -1.26%
• 6M: 2.41%
• YTD: 3.85%
• 1Y: 21.78%
• 3Y*: 7.07%
• 5Y*: 4.53%
• 10Y*: 8.22%
• ALL TIME*: 7.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF	$16.06M	$16.61M	$23.38M
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	$1.43B	$1.62B	$1.62B

XLV vs. IXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	5.90%	14.50%	2.47%	2.07%	-2.08%	26.04%	13.30%	20.45%	6.28%	21.77%
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF	3.85%	14.99%	0.55%	3.62%	-4.94%	19.60%	12.74%	23.23%	2.83%	20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and IXJ is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2001	0.88

The correlation between XLV and IXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLV vs. IXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLV	IXJ
Healthcare	99.4%	99.2%
Technology	0.5%	0.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.5%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLV vs. IXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLV

XLV Risk / Return Rank: 72
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 72
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

IXJ

IXJ Risk / Return Rank: 61
IXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
IXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
IXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLV vs. IXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLV	IXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.50	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.38	+0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.27	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	2.10	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.15	4.99	+1.16

XLV vs. IXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the IXJ Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and IXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLV vs. IXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, roughly equal to the maximum IXJ drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and IXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLV	IXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.17%	-40.60%	+1.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	-10.78%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.11%	-18.14%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.11%	-18.14%	+1.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.40%	-27.35%	-1.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.82%	-2.52%	-0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-6.90%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.37%	4.52%	-0.15%

Volatility

XLV vs. IXJ - Volatility Comparison

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) at 5.66%. This indicates that XLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLV	IXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	5.66%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.07%	11.61%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.90%	15.38%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.04%	14.50%	+0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.66%	15.74%	+0.92%

XLV vs. IXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IXJ's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLV vs. IXJ - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than IXJ's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IXJ iShares Global Healthcare ETF	1.44%	1.40%	1.50%	1.38%	1.17%	1.12%	1.27%	1.42%	2.11%	1.46%	1.73%	2.85%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.56%	1.60%	1.67%	1.59%	1.47%	1.33%	1.49%	2.17%	1.57%	1.47%	1.60%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLV and IXJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, XLV and IXJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, XLV or IXJ?

XLV has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to IXJ (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs IXJ's -40.60%.

Which ETF is better, XLV or IXJ?

On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 9.81% vs 8.22% for IXJ. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IXJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLV or IXJ?

Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 9.81% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLV or IXJ?

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLV or IXJ?

XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.44% for IXJ.

What is the main difference between XLV and IXJ?

XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while IXJ tracks S&P Global 1200 Health Care (Sector) Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.40% for IXJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.