PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XES vs. PIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XES vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 36.38% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 39.56% return.


XES

1D
3.09%
1M
2.89%
6M
12.93%
YTD
36.38%
1Y
68.96%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
17.17%
10Y*
-2.88%
ALL TIME*
-3.56%

PIT

1D
-0.05%
1M
12.38%
6M
25.04%
YTD
39.56%
1Y
54.64%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.38M$2.80M$3.76M
$5.46M$8.52M$12.51M

XES vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
36.38%5.89%-5.44%6.68%2.66%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
39.56%21.63%6.77%-4.54%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XES and PIT is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022

0.52

The correlation between XES and PIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XES vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XES vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XESPITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

3.19

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

10.87

-0.56

XES vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XES Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the PIT Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XES and PIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XES vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and PIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-17.20%

-78.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.48%

-17.20%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

-17.20%

-28.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.66%

-5.78%

-67.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

-4.27%

-50.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.73%

5.05%

+1.68%

Volatility

XES vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) at 6.47%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.34%

6.47%

+2.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.60%

19.93%

+1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.74%

22.30%

+8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.63%

17.70%

+20.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.85%

17.70%

+27.15%

XES vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

XES vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than PIT's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.39%8.92%3.59%6.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.17%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


XES and PIT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to PIT (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs PIT's -17.20%.

On 3-year performance, PIT leads with 19.64% vs 7.20% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PIT has been the lower-risk option at 6.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PIT has performed better with a 19.64% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 1.17% for XES.

XES is categorized as Energy Equities, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.55% for PIT.

PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XES and PIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer