PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PIT vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PIT vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PIT vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
35.92%21.63%6.77%-4.54%2.74%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
1.79%32.59%4.98%15.49%0.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIT achieves a 35.92% return, which is significantly higher than FTIHX's 1.79% return.


PIT

1D
-0.82%
1M
13.34%
YTD
35.92%
6M
42.54%
1Y
53.49%
3Y*
21.26%
5Y*
10Y*

FTIHX

1D
2.98%
1M
-7.01%
YTD
1.79%
6M
5.81%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
7.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PIT vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIT has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PIT vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIT vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PITFTIHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

1.74

+0.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

2.32

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.35

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.58

2.38

+2.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.49

9.30

+7.18

PIT vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIT Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIT and FTIHX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PITFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

1.74

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.56

+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between PIT and FTIHX is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PIT vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

PIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than FTIHX's 2.73% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
6.56%8.92%3.59%6.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.73%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%

Drawdowns

PIT vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIT drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIT and FTIHX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PITFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.27%

-35.75%

+23.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.66%

-11.25%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-8.61%

+7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-7.31%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

2.88%

+0.36%

Volatility

PIT vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a higher volatility of 10.18% compared to Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) at 7.78%. This indicates that PIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PITFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.18%

7.78%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.36%

11.04%

+6.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.27%

16.05%

+5.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

15.09%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.04%

16.02%

+1.02%