XES vs. IEO
XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) and IEO (iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XES tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index while IEO tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Exploration & Production Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XES returned -2.88%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for IEO. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XES charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IEO.
Performance
XES vs. IEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 36.38% return, which is significantly lower than IEO's 42.54% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed IEO with an annualized return of -2.88%, while IEO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.
XES
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- YTD
- 36.38%
- 1Y
- 76.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.17%
- 10Y*
- -2.88%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.56%
IEO
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 29.47%
- YTD
- 42.54%
- 1Y
- 47.44%
- 3Y*
- 12.66%
- 5Y*
- 23.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.85M | $6.98M | $8.74M | |
| $5.46M | $8.52M | $12.51M |
XES vs. IEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 36.38% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 42.54% | 2.15% | -1.45% | 3.57% | 57.82% | 75.57% | -32.77% | 9.63% | -19.44% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between XES and IEO is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XES and IEO has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XES vs. IEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XES
IEO
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XES
IEO
Industrials
XES
IEO
Basic Materials
XES
-
IEO
Communication Services
XES
-
IEO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XES
-
IEO
-
Consumer Defensive
XES
-
IEO
-
Financial Services
XES
-
IEO
-
Healthcare
XES
-
IEO
-
Real Estate
XES
-
IEO
-
Technology
XES
-
IEO
-
Utilities
XES
-
IEO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XES vs. IEO — Risk / Return Rank
XES
IEO
XES vs. IEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XES | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.27 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 2.64 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.31 | 6.61 | +3.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XES vs. IEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, which is greater than IEO's maximum drawdown of -79.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and IEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XES | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.65% | -79.17% | -16.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.48% | -16.32% | -5.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.95% | -31.46% | -14.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -31.46% | -14.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.23% | -75.00% | -16.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.66% | -1.83% | -71.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.50% | -26.14% | -28.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.73% | 6.54% | +0.19% |
Volatility
XES vs. IEO - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (IEO) at 7.46%. This indicates that XES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XES | IEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.34% | 7.46% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.60% | 20.47% | +1.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.74% | 25.90% | +4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.63% | 30.27% | +8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.85% | 34.91% | +9.94% |
XES vs. IEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XES has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IEO's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XES vs. IEO - Dividend Comparison
XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than IEO's 1.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEO iShares U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.85% | 2.61% | 2.63% | 3.00% | 3.77% | 2.62% | 3.17% | 1.85% | 1.67% | 0.94% | 0.98% | 2.03% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.17% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XES and IEO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XES has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to IEO (7.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs IEO's -79.17%.
On 10-year performance, IEO leads with 11.48% vs -2.88% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IEO has been the lower-risk option at 7.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IEO has performed better with a 11.48% return vs -2.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IEO.
IEO has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.17% for XES.
XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while IEO tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Exploration & Production Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XES and 0.38% for IEO.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XES and IEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer