PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XES vs. AMSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XES vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 37.45% return, which is significantly higher than AMSC's 24.95% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed AMSC with an annualized return of -4.13%, while AMSC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.


XES

1D
1.64%
1M
-8.57%
6M
26.49%
YTD
37.45%
1Y
65.04%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
14.19%
10Y*
-4.13%

AMSC

1D
-3.26%
1M
-8.99%
6M
17.25%
YTD
24.95%
1Y
-8.20%
3Y*
75.08%
5Y*
17.38%
10Y*
14.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XES vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
37.45%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
24.95%16.85%121.10%202.72%-66.18%-53.54%198.34%-29.60%207.16%-50.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XES and AMSC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.36

The correlation between XES and AMSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XES vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AMSC
AMSC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
AMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XES vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XESAMSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.06

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

-0.16

+3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

-0.25

+11.78

XES vs. AMSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XES Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the AMSC Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XES and AMSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XES vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, roughly equal to the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and AMSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESAMSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.65%

-99.57%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.69%

-61.08%

+40.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.95%

-63.86%

+17.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

-82.94%

+36.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.23%

-89.06%

-2.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.46%

-94.81%

+21.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.44%

-75.80%

+21.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

38.03%

-32.33%

Volatility

XES vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) is 9.22%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 22.33%. This indicates that XES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESAMSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.22%

22.33%

-13.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.50%

54.94%

-33.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.96%

85.50%

-54.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.85%

87.45%

-48.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.88%

79.28%

-34.40%

Dividends

XES vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison

XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.16%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


XES and AMSC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMSC has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to XES (9.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs AMSC's -99.57%.

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XES and AMSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer