XES vs. AMSC
XES (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, while AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XES returned -4.13%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for AMSC. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XES vs. AMSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XES achieves a 37.45% return, which is significantly higher than AMSC's 24.95% return. Over the past 10 years, XES has underperformed AMSC with an annualized return of -4.13%, while AMSC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.
XES
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -8.57%
- 6M
- 26.49%
- YTD
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 65.04%
- 3Y*
- 10.31%
- 5Y*
- 14.19%
- 10Y*
- -4.13%
AMSC
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -8.99%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 24.95%
- 1Y
- -8.20%
- 3Y*
- 75.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.38%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
XES vs. AMSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 37.45% | 5.89% | -5.44% | 6.68% | 62.03% | 12.00% | -43.38% | -9.00% | -46.99% | -21.93% |
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 24.95% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between XES and AMSC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.36 |
The correlation between XES and AMSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XES vs. AMSC — Risk / Return Rank
XES
AMSC
XES vs. AMSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) and American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XES | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.06 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | -0.16 | +3.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.53 | -0.25 | +11.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XES vs. AMSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XES drawdown since its inception was -95.65%, roughly equal to the maximum AMSC drawdown of -99.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XES and AMSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XES | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.65% | -99.57% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.69% | -61.08% | +40.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.95% | -63.86% | +17.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.95% | -82.94% | +36.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.23% | -89.06% | -2.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.46% | -94.81% | +21.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.44% | -75.80% | +21.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 38.03% | -32.33% |
Volatility
XES vs. AMSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) is 9.22%, while American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a volatility of 22.33%. This indicates that XES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XES | AMSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.22% | 22.33% | -13.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.50% | 54.94% | -33.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.96% | 85.50% | -54.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.85% | 87.45% | -48.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.88% | 79.28% | -34.40% |
Dividends
XES vs. AMSC - Dividend Comparison
XES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XES SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF | 1.16% | 1.69% | 1.31% | 0.66% | 0.36% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 1.43% | 1.14% | 1.68% | 0.64% | 2.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XES and AMSC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (22.33%) compared to XES (9.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XES dropped -95.65% vs AMSC's -99.57%.
XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XES and AMSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer