AMSC vs. LW
AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) and LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. AMSC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while LW operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, AMSC returned 21.77%/yr vs -9.48%/yr for LW. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMSC vs. LW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 57.49% return, which is significantly higher than LW's 6.08% return.
AMSC
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -12.57%
- YTD
- 57.49%
- 6M
- 42.26%
- 1Y
- 49.10%
- 3Y*
- 97.65%
- 5Y*
- 21.77%
- 10Y*
- 18.66%
LW
- 1D
- -3.06%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 6M
- 3.82%
- 1Y
- -15.95%
- 3Y*
- -25.87%
- 5Y*
- -9.48%
- 10Y*
- —
AMSC vs. LW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 57.49% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 6.08% | -35.69% | -37.01% | 22.32% | 42.89% | -18.40% | -7.23% | 18.27% | 31.81% | 51.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMSC and LW is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2016 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
AMSC:
$2.12B
LW:
$6.08B
AMSC:
$3.05
LW:
$2.15
AMSC:
14.87
LW:
20.30
AMSC:
0.03
LW:
0.28
AMSC:
6.65
LW:
0.94
AMSC:
3.81
LW:
3.33
AMSC:
$299.15M
LW:
$6.52B
AMSC:
$91.38M
LW:
$1.34B
AMSC:
$19.29M
LW:
$893.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMSC vs. LW — Risk / Return Rank
AMSC
LW
AMSC vs. LW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMSC | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.97 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | -0.39 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.34 | -0.66 | +1.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMSC vs. LW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than LW's maximum drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and LW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMSC | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -64.56% | -35.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.08% | -41.37% | -19.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.86% | -64.56% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.94% | -64.56% | -18.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.45% | -59.42% | -34.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.77% | -21.40% | -54.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.81% | 24.31% | +12.50% |
Volatility
AMSC vs. LW - Volatility Comparison
American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 22.69% compared to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (LW) at 8.70%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMSC | LW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.69% | 8.70% | +13.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.79% | 38.51% | +16.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.50% | 44.41% | +41.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.48% | 37.88% | +49.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.23% | 35.87% | +43.36% |
Dividends
AMSC vs. LW - Dividend Comparison
AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LW Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. | 3.43% | 3.53% | 2.15% | 1.04% | 1.10% | 1.48% | 1.17% | 0.93% | 1.04% | 1.33% |
Financials
AMSC vs. LW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Superconductor Corporation and Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMSC vs. LW - Profitability Comparison
AMSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
LW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 331.60M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.2%.
AMSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.
LW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 126.60M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.1%.
AMSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
LW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 54.00M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMSC and LW have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (22.69%) compared to LW (8.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs LW's -64.56%.
AMSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMSC and LW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer