PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDSQ vs. JETU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDSQ vs. JETU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDSQ achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than JETU's 23.36% return.


XDSQ

1D
0.07%
1M
0.66%
YTD
3.09%
6M
2.64%
1Y
15.56%
3Y*
14.48%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*

JETU

1D
0.37%
1M
27.87%
YTD
23.36%
6M
14.56%
1Y
100.89%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDSQ vs. JETU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XDSQ
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF
3.09%14.22%23.12%3.50%
JETU
MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN
23.36%3.88%38.00%-15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XDSQ and JETU is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023

0.59

The correlation between XDSQ and JETU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDSQ vs. JETU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDSQ
XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

JETU
JETU Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
JETU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JETU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
JETU Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JETU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JETU Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDSQ vs. JETU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) and MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDSQJETUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.05

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.76

5.04

+2.73

XDSQ vs. JETU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDSQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the JETU Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDSQ and JETU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDSQ vs. JETU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDSQ drawdown since its inception was -26.06%, smaller than the maximum JETU drawdown of -68.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDSQ and JETU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDSQJETUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.06%

-68.64%

+42.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-49.39%

+39.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-68.64%

+49.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-11.65%

+11.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-29.34%

+24.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

20.10%

-18.09%

Volatility

XDSQ vs. JETU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) is 0.61%, while MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN (JETU) has a volatility of 29.31%. This indicates that XDSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JETU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDSQJETUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

29.31%

-28.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

61.63%

-53.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

76.12%

-65.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

71.57%

-56.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

71.57%

-56.54%

XDSQ vs. JETU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than JETU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDSQ vs. JETU - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDSQ nor JETU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDSQ and JETU have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JETU has higher volatility (29.31%) compared to XDSQ (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XDSQ dropped -26.06% vs JETU's -68.64%.

On 3-year performance, JETU leads with 14.87% vs 14.48% for XDSQ. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JETU has performed better with a 14.87% return vs 14.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for JETU.

XDSQ and JETU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Max. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XDSQ and 0.95% for JETU.

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDSQ and JETU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer