PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDND.DE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDND.DE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc) (XDND.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDND.DE is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDND.DE achieves a 16.84% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.84% return. Over the past 10 years, XDND.DE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 9.32%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.90% annualized return.


XDND.DE

1D
0.64%
1M
3.17%
6M
11.32%
YTD
16.84%
1Y
22.89%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
9.32%

SCHG

1D
-1.27%
1M
2.82%
6M
7.35%
YTD
7.84%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
17.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDND.DE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDND.DE
Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc)
16.84%0.21%17.37%2.26%0.85%33.35%-8.47%25.76%-0.21%4.27%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.84%3.56%43.86%45.60%-27.58%37.70%27.67%39.09%3.27%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between XDND.DE and SCHG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2014

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between XDND.DE and SCHG has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDND.DE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDND.DE
XDND.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XDND.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDND.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDND.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XDND.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDND.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDND.DE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc) (XDND.DE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDND.DESCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.19

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

1.09

+3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.16

3.11

+11.05

XDND.DE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDND.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDND.DE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDND.DE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDND.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.18%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDND.DE and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDND.DESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.18%

-31.88%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.92%

-15.64%

+10.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.13%

-28.18%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

-30.34%

+12.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.18%

-31.88%

-0.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-1.86%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-5.21%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

5.50%

-3.89%

Volatility

XDND.DE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc) (XDND.DE) is 2.79%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that XDND.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDND.DESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

4.16%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.07%

11.89%

-4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.51%

16.39%

-6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.52%

22.05%

-9.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

21.90%

-5.82%

XDND.DE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDND.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDND.DE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

XDND.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
XDND.DE
Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDND.DE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XDND.DE.

XDND.DE is categorized as Dividend, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XDND.DE tracks MSCI North America High Dividend Yield Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XDND.DE and 0.04% for SCHG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDND.DE and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer