PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDND.DE vs. HDLV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDND.DE vs. HDLV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc) (XDND.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDND.DE achieves a 15.70% return, which is significantly higher than HDLV.DE's 12.89% return. Over the past 10 years, XDND.DE has outperformed HDLV.DE with an annualized return of 9.54%, while HDLV.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.48% annualized return.


XDND.DE

1D
0.33%
1M
3.13%
6M
16.23%
YTD
15.70%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
9.54%

HDLV.DE

1D
0.44%
1M
6.78%
6M
13.04%
YTD
12.89%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
9.63%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
6.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDND.DE vs. HDLV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDND.DE
Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc)
15.70%0.21%17.37%2.26%0.85%33.35%-8.47%25.76%-0.21%4.27%
HDLV.DE
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
12.89%-8.06%23.32%-2.45%6.28%35.97%-19.13%21.77%-2.56%-2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between XDND.DE and HDLV.DE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2015

0.85

The correlation between XDND.DE and HDLV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDND.DE vs. HDLV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDND.DE
XDND.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XDND.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDND.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDND.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XDND.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDND.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HDLV.DE
HDLV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
HDLV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDND.DE vs. HDLV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc) (XDND.DE) and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDND.DEHDLV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.21

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

2.13

+2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.43

5.44

+7.99

XDND.DE vs. HDLV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDND.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the HDLV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDND.DE and HDLV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDND.DE vs. HDLV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDND.DE drawdown since its inception was -32.18%, smaller than the maximum HDLV.DE drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDND.DE and HDLV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDND.DEHDLV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.18%

-39.21%

+7.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.92%

-6.56%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.13%

-19.09%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.13%

-19.99%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.18%

-39.21%

+7.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.47%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-8.71%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.58%

-0.95%

Volatility

XDND.DE vs. HDLV.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc) (XDND.DE) is 2.40%, while Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF (HDLV.DE) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that XDND.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDLV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDND.DEHDLV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

3.52%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

8.46%

-1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.57%

10.99%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.51%

13.60%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

17.10%

-1.03%

XDND.DE vs. HDLV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDND.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than HDLV.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDND.DE vs. HDLV.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDND.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDLV.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDLV.DE
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility UCITS ETF
3.47%4.01%3.43%4.14%3.60%3.24%4.64%3.68%3.70%3.22%2.93%1.86%
XDND.DE
Xtrackers MSCI North America High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDND.DE and HDLV.DE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HDLV.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDLV.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XDND.DE.

XDND.DE tracks MSCI North America High Dividend Yield Index, while HDLV.DE tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Net Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XDND.DE and 0.30% for HDLV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDND.DE and HDLV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer