PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCOR vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XCOR vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundx ETF (XCOR) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCOR vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCOR
Fundx ETF
-4.58%12.50%29.57%14.34%7.11%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-0.34%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.95%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCOR achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -0.34% return.


XCOR

1D
3.10%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10Y*

CCOR

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.35%
1Y
-1.48%
3Y*
-3.32%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XCOR vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCOR has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XCOR vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCOR
XCOR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCOR vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundx ETF (XCOR) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCORCCORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

-0.14

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

-0.14

+1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.98

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.19

+1.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.78

-0.35

+7.13

XCOR vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCOR Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCOR and CCOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCORCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

-0.14

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.15

+0.82

Correlation

The correlation between XCOR and CCOR is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

XCOR vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

XCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than CCOR's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCOR
Fundx ETF
0.45%0.43%0.00%0.95%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.07%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%

Drawdowns

XCOR vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, roughly equal to the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCOR and CCOR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XCORCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-22.99%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-9.17%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-17.23%

+10.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-7.07%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

4.95%

-2.30%

Volatility

XCOR vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Fundx ETF (XCOR) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that XCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XCORCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

2.17%

+3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

5.44%

+4.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

10.74%

+7.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

11.13%

+6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

10.81%

+6.40%