PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCOR vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCOR vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundx ETF (XCOR) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCOR achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 21.09% return.


XCOR

1D
0.95%
1M
-1.70%
6M
5.73%
YTD
7.10%
1Y
17.83%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.13%

DARP

1D
2.96%
1M
-3.88%
6M
9.77%
YTD
21.09%
1Y
49.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
31.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$346.01K$294.81K$497.24K
$35.41K$53.25K$135.69K

XCOR vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCOR
Fundx ETF
7.10%12.50%29.57%10.72%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
21.09%40.19%24.63%6.25%

Correlation

The correlation between XCOR and DARP is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023

0.85

The correlation between XCOR and DARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCOR vs. DARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCOR
DARP

Technology

51.1%
48.3%

Communication Services

11.3%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
8.3%

Industrials

8.8%
8.2%

Financial Services

6.3%

-

Healthcare

6.0%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%

-

Energy

2.2%
9.2%

Basic Materials

0.9%
4.2%

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Utilities

0.7%
5.2%

Technology

XCOR
51.1%
DARP
48.3%

Communication Services

XCOR
11.3%
DARP
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XCOR
9.0%
DARP
8.3%

Industrials

XCOR
8.8%
DARP
8.2%

Financial Services

XCOR
6.3%
DARP

-

Healthcare

XCOR
6.0%
DARP
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

XCOR
2.9%
DARP

-

Energy

XCOR
2.2%
DARP
9.2%

Basic Materials

XCOR
0.9%
DARP
4.2%

Real Estate

XCOR
0.7%
DARP

-

Utilities

XCOR
0.7%
DARP
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCOR vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XCOR
XCOR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
XCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XCOR vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundx ETF (XCOR) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCORDARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.27

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

2.92

-1.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

11.11

-5.27

XCOR vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCOR and DARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCOR vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum DARP drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCOR and DARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCORDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-30.27%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-15.76%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.24%

-9.42%

+3.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.16%

-4.72%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

4.14%

-1.29%

Volatility

XCOR vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fundx ETF (XCOR) is 6.63%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 9.87%. This indicates that XCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCORDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.63%

9.87%

-3.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

21.44%

-8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

26.87%

-11.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

26.83%

-9.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.39%

26.83%

-9.44%

XCOR vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCOR has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCOR vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

XCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than DARP's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.36%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%
XCOR
Fundx ETF
0.40%0.43%0.00%0.95%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCOR and DARP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DARP has higher volatility (9.87%) compared to XCOR (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCOR dropped -22.54% vs DARP's -30.27%.

On 1-year performance, DARP leads with 49.32% vs 17.83% for XCOR. On fees, DARP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XCOR has been the lower-risk option at 6.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DARP has performed better with a 49.32% return vs 17.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DARP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for XCOR.

XCOR has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.36% for DARP.

They also come from different issuers: FundX and Grizzle. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for XCOR and 0.75% for DARP.

DARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCOR and DARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer