XCHG vs. FNDX

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

XCHG (AB US Equity ETF) and FNDX (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCHG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while FNDX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. XCHG is actively managed, while FNDX is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCHG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDX.

Performance

XCHG vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHG achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 16.34% return.

XCHG

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 3.47%
• 6M: 6.06%
• YTD: 8.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 0.74%
• 6M: 12.58%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 1Y: 28.19%
• 3Y*: 19.80%
• 5Y*: 13.47%
• 10Y*: 14.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCHG vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XCHG AB US Equity ETF	8.47%	0.38%
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	16.34%	-0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between XCHG and FNDX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

XCHG vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FNDX

FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHG vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB US Equity ETF (XCHG) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XCHG	FNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.68	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.74	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.49	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.56	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	17.64	—

Drawdowns

XCHG vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHG drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHG and FNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCHG	FNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.66%	-37.72%	+28.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.06%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-3.54%	+1.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.57%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XCHG	FNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.80%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.16%	10.33%	+2.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.16%	15.13%	-1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.16%	17.43%	-4.27%

XCHG vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCHG vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

XCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than FNDX's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF	1.47%	1.63%	1.76%	1.82%	2.07%	1.64%	2.29%	2.23%	2.40%	1.86%	2.01%	2.01%
XCHG AB US Equity ETF	0.37%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCHG and FNDX in my portfolio?

XCHG and FNDX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XCHG or FNDX?

On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCHG or FNDX?

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCHG or FNDX?

FNDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.37% for XCHG.

What is the main difference between XCHG and FNDX?

XCHG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHG and 0.25% for FNDX.