XCCC vs. USL
XCCC (BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - XCCC is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCCC returned 10.80%/yr vs 17.93%/yr for USL. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCCC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
XCCC vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.
XCCC
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- 60.58%
- 6M
- 56.11%
- 1Y
- 56.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.93%
- 5Y*
- 17.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.57%
XCCC vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.13% | 7.25% | 13.01% | 20.57% | -5.33% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 60.58% | -12.37% | 8.30% | -1.11% | -14.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCCC and USL is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022 | 0.04 |
The correlation between XCCC and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XCCC vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XCCC
USL
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
XCCC
USL
-
Energy
XCCC
USL
-
Industrials
XCCC
USL
-
Real Estate
XCCC
USL
-
Basic Materials
XCCC
USL
-
Healthcare
XCCC
USL
-
Technology
XCCC
USL
-
Consumer Cyclical
XCCC
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
XCCC
USL
-
Financial Services
XCCC
USL
Utilities
XCCC
-
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCCC vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
XCCC
USL
XCCC vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCCC | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.33 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 3.39 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.71 | 6.85 | -3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCCC | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.99 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.01 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
XCCC vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCCC | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -89.06% | +78.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.11% | -16.76% | +11.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.99% | -23.33% | +12.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -39.10% | +38.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.93% | -61.45% | +59.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 8.27% | -6.74% |
Volatility
XCCC vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) is 1.50%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that XCCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCCC | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 10.57% | -9.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.00% | 23.34% | -19.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.25% | 28.59% | -23.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.82% | 30.09% | -21.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.82% | 32.34% | -23.52% |
XCCC vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCCC vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.03%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCCC BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 10.03% | 10.06% | 10.68% | 12.05% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCCC and USL have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to XCCC (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCCC dropped -10.99% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 3-year performance, USL leads with 17.93% vs 10.80% for XCCC. On fees, XCCC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XCCC has been the lower-risk option at 1.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.93% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XCCC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.03%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
XCCC is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while USL is Oil & Gas. XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XCCC and 0.88% for USL.
USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XCCC and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer