PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCCC vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCCC vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.


XCCC

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.48%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
10.80%
5Y*
10Y*

USL

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
60.58%
6M
56.11%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCCC vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.13%7.25%13.01%20.57%-5.33%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
60.58%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%-14.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XCCC and USL is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2022

0.04

The correlation between XCCC and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XCCC vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCCC
USL

Communication Services

12.8%

-

Energy

3.9%

-

Industrials

3.7%

-

Real Estate

3.7%

-

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Healthcare

3.2%

-

Technology

2.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Financial Services

0.7%
4.5%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

XCCC
12.8%
USL

-

Energy

XCCC
3.9%
USL

-

Industrials

XCCC
3.7%
USL

-

Real Estate

XCCC
3.7%
USL

-

Basic Materials

XCCC
3.2%
USL

-

Healthcare

XCCC
3.2%
USL

-

Technology

XCCC
2.8%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

XCCC
1.8%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

XCCC
0.9%
USL

-

Financial Services

XCCC
0.7%
USL
4.5%

Utilities

XCCC

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCCC vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCCC
XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCCC vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCCCUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.39

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.71

6.85

-3.14

XCCC vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCCC and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCCCUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.99

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.01

+0.96

Drawdowns

XCCC vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCCCUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.99%

-89.06%

+78.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-16.76%

+11.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.99%

-23.33%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-39.10%

+38.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-61.45%

+59.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

8.27%

-6.74%

Volatility

XCCC vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) is 1.50%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that XCCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCCCUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

10.57%

-9.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.00%

23.34%

-19.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.25%

28.59%

-23.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.82%

30.09%

-21.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.82%

32.34%

-23.52%

XCCC vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCCC vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.03%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
10.03%10.06%10.68%12.05%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCCC and USL have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to XCCC (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCCC dropped -10.99% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 3-year performance, USL leads with 17.93% vs 10.80% for XCCC. On fees, XCCC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XCCC has been the lower-risk option at 1.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.93% return vs 10.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XCCC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.03%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

XCCC is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while USL is Oil & Gas. XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XCCC and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCCC and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer