PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCCC vs. XB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCCC vs. XB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly lower than XB's 2.29% return.


XCCC

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.95%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.89%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
10.43%
5Y*
10Y*

XB

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.78%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.62%
1Y
6.90%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCCC vs. XB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.47%7.25%13.01%20.57%-4.80%
XB
BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.29%7.81%7.41%12.94%-2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XCCC and XB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2022

0.85

The correlation between XCCC and XB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCCC vs. XB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCCC
XCCC Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XCCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCCC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XCCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCCC Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XB
XB Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCCC vs. XB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCCCXBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.22

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

13.92

-10.13

XCCC vs. XB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the XB Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCCC and XB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCCC vs. XB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, which is greater than XB's maximum drawdown of -9.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and XB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCCCXBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.99%

-9.25%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-2.16%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.99%

-5.36%

-5.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.27%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.91%

-1.30%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

0.50%

+1.04%

Volatility

XCCC vs. XB - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) at 1.08%. This indicates that XCCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCCCXBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

1.08%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.10%

3.06%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.30%

3.82%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.79%

7.44%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.79%

7.44%

+1.35%

XCCC vs. XB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCCC vs. XB - Dividend Comparison

XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than XB's 7.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
XB
BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.05%6.96%7.74%7.87%5.01%
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
10.00%10.06%10.68%12.05%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCCC and XB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XCCC has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to XB (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCCC dropped -10.99% vs XB's -9.25%.

On 3-year performance, XCCC leads with 10.43% vs 8.69% for XB. On fees, XB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, XB has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XCCC has performed better with a 10.43% return vs 8.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for XCCC.

XCCC has the higher dividend yield at 10.00%, compared with 7.05% for XB.

XCCC tracks ICE BofA CCC and Lower US High Yield Constrained Index, while XB tracks ICE BofA Single-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for XCCC and 0.30% for XB.

XB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCCC and XB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer