XCCC vs. HYSA

In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than HYSA's 2.31% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HYSA's 0.55% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current XCCC Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the HYSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCCC and HYSA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than HYSA's 6.89% yield.

The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -11.00%, smaller than the maximum HYSA drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and HYSA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a higher volatility of 3.43% compared to Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) at 1.83%. This indicates that XCCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.