PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XCCC vs. CLOZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XCCC and CLOZ is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

XCCC vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
10.58%
5.13%
XCCC
CLOZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XCCC:

2.18

CLOZ:

6.41

Sortino Ratio

XCCC:

3.11

CLOZ:

9.12

Omega Ratio

XCCC:

1.43

CLOZ:

3.36

Calmar Ratio

XCCC:

3.31

CLOZ:

8.61

Martin Ratio

XCCC:

10.46

CLOZ:

54.23

Ulcer Index

XCCC:

1.19%

CLOZ:

0.22%

Daily Std Dev

XCCC:

5.74%

CLOZ:

1.86%

Max Drawdown

XCCC:

-9.97%

CLOZ:

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

XCCC:

-1.22%

CLOZ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCCC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's 11.64% return.


XCCC

YTD

12.33%

1M

-0.06%

6M

10.36%

1Y

12.63%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CLOZ

YTD

11.64%

1M

0.84%

6M

5.13%

1Y

11.94%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XCCC vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCCC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
Expense ratio chart for CLOZ: current value at 0.50% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.50%
Expense ratio chart for XCCC: current value at 0.40% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.40%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XCCC vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XCCC, currently valued at 2.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.206.41
The chart of Sortino ratio for XCCC, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.003.149.12
The chart of Omega ratio for XCCC, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.443.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for XCCC, currently valued at 3.35, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.358.61
The chart of Martin ratio for XCCC, currently valued at 10.56, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.5654.23
XCCC
CLOZ

The current XCCC Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 6.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCCC and CLOZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.003.004.005.006.007.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2.20
6.41
XCCC
CLOZ

Dividends

XCCC vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

XCCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.76%, more than CLOZ's 8.75% yield.


TTM20232022
XCCC
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
10.76%11.01%7.64%
CLOZ
Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF
8.75%8.81%0.00%

Drawdowns

XCCC vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCCC drawdown since its inception was -9.97%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -2.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCCC and CLOZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-2.50%-2.00%-1.50%-1.00%-0.50%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.22%
0
XCCC
CLOZ

Volatility

XCCC vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

BondBloxx CCC Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XCCC) has a higher volatility of 1.70% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.21%. This indicates that XCCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.70%
0.21%
XCCC
CLOZ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab