XAR vs. REG
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) is Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while REG (Regency Centers Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XAR returned 18.45%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for REG. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XAR vs. REG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly lower than REG's 18.54% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed REG with an annualized return of 18.45%, while REG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.12% annualized return.
XAR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
REG
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 18.54%
- 6M
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
XAR vs. REG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.10% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 18.54% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | -23.86% | 11.43% | -12.00% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and REG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XAR and REG has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. REG — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
REG
XAR vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAR | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 2.16 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 5.27 | +1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAR vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum REG drawdown of -73.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and REG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -73.37% | +27.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -8.17% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -15.10% | -4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -30.09% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -57.02% | +10.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.32% | -0.10% | -4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -16.17% | +9.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.13% | 3.35% | +2.78% |
Volatility
XAR vs. REG - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 4.45%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.46% | 4.45% | +7.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.56% | 11.10% | +12.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.85% | 15.90% | +11.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.66% | 22.39% | +1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 29.88% | -5.14% |
Dividends
XAR vs. REG - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than REG's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.70% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAR and REG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to REG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs REG's -73.37%.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and REG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer