PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. REG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. REG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly lower than REG's 18.54% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed REG with an annualized return of 18.45%, while REG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.12% annualized return.


XAR

1D
-1.55%
1M
7.38%
YTD
16.10%
6M
18.39%
1Y
42.07%
3Y*
33.32%
5Y*
16.58%
10Y*
18.45%

REG

1D
0.43%
1M
6.55%
YTD
18.54%
6M
22.12%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
4.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. REG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
16.10%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
18.54%-2.78%14.90%11.85%-13.59%71.41%-23.86%11.43%-12.00%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and REG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between XAR and REG has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. REG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

REG
REG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XARREGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.16

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.81

5.27

+1.54

XAR vs. REG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the REG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and REG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAR vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum REG drawdown of -73.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and REG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARREGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-73.37%

+27.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-8.17%

-9.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-15.10%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.40%

-30.09%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-57.02%

+10.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.32%

-0.10%

-4.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-16.17%

+9.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

3.35%

+2.78%

Volatility

XAR vs. REG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 11.46% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 4.45%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARREGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.46%

4.45%

+7.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.56%

11.10%

+12.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.85%

15.90%

+11.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.66%

22.39%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

29.88%

-5.14%

Dividends

XAR vs. REG - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than REG's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.70%4.16%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.31%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and REG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAR has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to REG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs REG's -73.37%.

XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and REG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer