XAR vs. ITA
XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) and ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - XAR tracks the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index while ITA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XAR returned 18.54%/yr vs 15.64%/yr for ITA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XAR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ITA.
Performance
XAR vs. ITA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly higher than ITA's 9.85% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed ITA with an annualized return of 18.54%, while ITA has yielded a comparatively lower 15.64% annualized return.
XAR
- 1D
- -2.24%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 11.31%
- 1Y
- 40.45%
- 3Y*
- 33.82%
- 5Y*
- 16.54%
- 10Y*
- 18.54%
ITA
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 31.18%
- 3Y*
- 28.43%
- 5Y*
- 17.33%
- 10Y*
- 15.64%
XAR vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 15.26% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 9.85% | 48.64% | 15.81% | 14.33% | 9.96% | 9.39% | -13.57% | 30.51% | -7.22% | 35.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAR and ITA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.90 |
The correlation between XAR and ITA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
XAR vs. ITA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XAR
ITA
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
XAR
ITA
Technology
XAR
ITA
Basic Materials
XAR
-
ITA
-
Communication Services
XAR
-
ITA
-
Consumer Cyclical
XAR
-
ITA
-
Consumer Defensive
XAR
-
ITA
-
Energy
XAR
-
ITA
-
Financial Services
XAR
-
ITA
-
Healthcare
XAR
-
ITA
-
Real Estate
XAR
-
ITA
-
Utilities
XAR
-
ITA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAR vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank
XAR
ITA
XAR vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAR | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.98 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.60 | 5.21 | +1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAR vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum ITA drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and ITA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAR | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.37% | -59.72% | +13.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -15.82% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.73% | -15.82% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.40% | -18.72% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -51.00% | +4.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.02% | -5.89% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -9.45% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 6.00% | +0.15% |
Volatility
XAR vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 10.60% compared to iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) at 8.50%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAR | ITA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.60% | 8.50% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.50% | 18.55% | +4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.02% | 21.95% | +6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 20.23% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 23.26% | +1.51% |
XAR vs. ITA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ITA's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAR vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison
XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than ITA's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.34% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XAR and ITA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XAR has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to ITA (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs ITA's -59.72%.
On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 18.54% vs 15.64% for ITA. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ITA has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.54% return vs 15.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for ITA.
ITA has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.34% for XAR.
XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.38% for ITA.
XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XAR and ITA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer