PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAR vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAR vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAR achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -0.90% return. Over the past 10 years, XAR has outperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 17.12%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively lower 13.25% annualized return.


XAR

1D
0.29%
1M
-8.77%
6M
-11.36%
YTD
7.56%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
29.13%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
17.12%
ALL TIME*
18.23%

FDIS

1D
-0.77%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-3.89%
YTD
-0.90%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
11.54%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
13.25%
ALL TIME*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAR vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
7.56%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-0.90%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XAR and FDIS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.63

The correlation between XAR and FDIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XAR vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XAR
FDIS

Industrials

98.4%
1.1%

Technology

1.6%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

96.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

1.2%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

XAR
98.4%
FDIS
1.1%

Technology

XAR
1.6%
FDIS
1.0%

Basic Materials

XAR

-

FDIS

-

Communication Services

XAR

-

FDIS
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XAR

-

FDIS
96.2%

Consumer Defensive

XAR

-

FDIS
1.2%

Energy

XAR

-

FDIS

-

Financial Services

XAR

-

FDIS
0.1%

Healthcare

XAR

-

FDIS
0.1%

Real Estate

XAR

-

FDIS
0.1%

Utilities

XAR

-

FDIS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAR vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAR vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XARFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.07

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

0.37

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.66

1.10

+1.55

XAR vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAR and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XAR vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAR drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAR and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XARFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-39.16%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-15.50%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.73%

-27.43%

+7.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.29%

-39.16%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.37%

-39.16%

-7.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.36%

-5.45%

-5.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-7.47%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.45%

5.20%

+1.25%

Volatility

XAR vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) at 5.26%. This indicates that XAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XARFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.93%

5.26%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.61%

14.02%

+8.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.29%

18.87%

+9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.70%

24.01%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.78%

22.33%

+2.45%

XAR vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAR vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

XAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than FDIS's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.74%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.31%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAR and FDIS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XAR has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to FDIS (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAR dropped -46.37% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 17.12% vs 13.25% for FDIS. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 17.12% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.

XAR is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XAR and 0.08% for FDIS.

XAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAR and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer