XAGH.TO vs. FSHBX
XAGH.TO (iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and FSHBX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund) are both Total Bond Market funds. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XAGH.TO charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FSHBX.
Performance
XAGH.TO vs. FSHBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XAGH.TO is traded in CAD, while FSHBX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FSHBX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
XAGH.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSHBX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 4.22%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 6.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
XAGH.TO vs. FSHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XAGH.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.21% |
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 3.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XAGH.TO and FSHBX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2026 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XAGH.TO vs. FSHBX — Risk / Return Rank
XAGH.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FSHBX
XAGH.TO vs. FSHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XAGH.TO | FSHBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XAGH.TO vs. FSHBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XAGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum FSHBX drawdown of -27.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGH.TO and FSHBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XAGH.TO | FSHBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -27.85% | +24.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | 0.00% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -8.51% | +7.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.45% | — |
Volatility
XAGH.TO vs. FSHBX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XAGH.TO | FSHBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.01% | 4.83% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 6.57% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 6.79% | -1.78% |
XAGH.TO vs. FSHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XAGH.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FSHBX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XAGH.TO vs. FSHBX - Dividend Comparison
XAGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than FSHBX's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 4.18% | 4.26% | 4.00% | 3.00% | 0.83% | 1.04% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.27% | 1.12% | 0.88% |
XAGH.TO iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XAGH.TO and FSHBX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for XAGH.TO and FSHBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer