FSHBX vs. FCNVX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FSHBX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund) and FCNVX (Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class) are both mutual funds - FSHBX is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FCNVX is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX returned 2.08%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FCNVX. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FSHBX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FCNVX.

Performance

FSHBX vs. FCNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSHBX achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than FCNVX's 1.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX has underperformed FCNVX with an annualized return of 2.08%, while FCNVX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.60% annualized return.

FSHBX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.12%
• 6M: 0.31%
• YTD: 0.65%
• 1Y: 2.62%
• 3Y*: 4.68%
• 5Y*: 2.23%
• 10Y*: 2.08%
• ALL TIME*: 3.19%

FCNVX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 1.49%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 1Y: 3.71%
• 3Y*: 4.81%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 2.60%
• ALL TIME*: 1.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FSHBX vs. FCNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	0.65%	5.49%	4.73%	5.35%	-3.86%	-0.92%	3.59%	4.20%	1.21%	1.16%
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	1.82%	4.51%	5.43%	5.86%	0.85%	-0.06%	1.10%	3.00%	1.82%	1.42%

Correlation

The correlation between FSHBX and FCNVX is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.44
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2011	0.37

The correlation between FSHBX and FCNVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSHBX vs. FCNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSHBX

FSHBX Risk / Return Rank: 84
FSHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FSHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FSHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FSHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FSHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

FCNVX

FCNVX Risk / Return Rank: 100
FCNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FCNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FCNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSHBX vs. FCNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSHBX	FCNVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	3.44	-1.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	16.47	-13.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	7.52	-6.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	41.30	-38.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.61	118.36	-107.76

FSHBX vs. FCNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSHBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the FCNVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSHBX and FCNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSHBX vs. FCNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSHBX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, which is greater than FCNVX's maximum drawdown of -2.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHBX and FCNVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSHBX	FCNVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-2.19%	-6.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.17%	-0.10%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.17%	-0.30%	-0.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.36%	-0.59%	-5.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-6.51%	-2.19%	-4.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	0.00%	-0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-0.05%	-0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.32%	0.03%	+0.29%

Volatility

FSHBX vs. FCNVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) has a higher volatility of 0.44% compared to Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class (FCNVX) at 0.25%. This indicates that FSHBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSHBX	FCNVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.44%	0.25%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.45%	0.82%	+0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92%	1.19%	+0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.23%	1.30%	+0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.86%	1.05%	+0.81%

FSHBX vs. FCNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSHBX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNVX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSHBX vs. FCNVX - Dividend Comparison

FSHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than FCNVX's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNVX Fidelity Conservative Income Bond Institutional Class	3.74%	4.41%	5.17%	4.97%	1.24%	0.24%	0.99%	2.45%	2.21%	1.30%	1.01%	0.48%
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund	3.79%	4.26%	4.00%	3.00%	0.83%	1.04%	2.62%	2.13%	1.78%	1.27%	1.12%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSHBX and FCNVX in my portfolio?

FSHBX and FCNVX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSHBX or FCNVX?

FSHBX has higher volatility (0.44%) compared to FCNVX (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHBX dropped -8.80% vs FCNVX's -2.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.