PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XAGH.TO vs. PSLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XAGH.TO vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XAGH.TO is traded in CAD, while PSLV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSLV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAGH.TO achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than PSLV's -0.53% return.


XAGH.TO

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.11%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-0.86%
1Y
3.18%
3Y*
2.34%
5Y*
10Y*

PSLV

1D
-2.36%
1M
0.35%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
18.00%
1Y
102.67%
3Y*
43.38%
5Y*
21.82%
10Y*
14.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAGH.TO vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XAGH.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
-0.57%5.24%0.01%4.10%-13.03%0.15%
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
-0.53%133.84%29.69%-4.10%10.06%-3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XAGH.TO and PSLV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2021

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XAGH.TO vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAGH.TO
XAGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XAGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PSLV
PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAGH.TO vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XAGH.TOPSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.34

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

2.63

-1.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

5.80

-2.94

XAGH.TO vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAGH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAGH.TO and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XAGH.TOPSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.80

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.21

0.25

-0.46

Drawdowns

XAGH.TO vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -17.09%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -69.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAGH.TO and PSLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XAGH.TOPSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.09%

-69.07%

+51.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.18%

-39.32%

+36.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.03%

-39.32%

+33.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.62%

-34.50%

+28.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.71%

-47.92%

+39.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

17.77%

-16.66%

Volatility

XAGH.TO vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XAGH.TO) is 1.70%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.49%. This indicates that XAGH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XAGH.TOPSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

16.49%

-14.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

56.04%

-53.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

57.28%

-52.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.95%

33.91%

-25.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.95%

29.59%

-21.64%

XAGH.TO vs. PSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAGH.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PSLV's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

XAGH.TO vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

XAGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XAGH.TO
iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
4.01%3.78%3.51%3.05%1.91%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


XAGH.TO and PSLV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XAGH.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XAGH.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for PSLV.

XAGH.TO is categorized as Total Bond Market, while PSLV is Silver. XAGH.TO tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index (CAD-Hedged), while PSLV tracks No Index (Physical Silver). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for XAGH.TO and 0.51% for PSLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XAGH.TO and PSLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer