FSHBX vs. BSV
FSHBX (Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund) and BSV (Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares) are both funds - FSHBX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while BSV is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. 1–5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX returned 2.09%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for BSV. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSHBX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BSV.
Performance
FSHBX vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSHBX achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly higher than BSV's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FSHBX has outperformed BSV with an annualized return of 2.09%, while BSV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.90% annualized return.
FSHBX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- 1Y
- 3.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
BSV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 3.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
FSHBX vs. BSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 0.32% | 5.49% | 4.73% | 5.35% | -3.86% | -0.92% | 3.59% | 4.20% | 1.21% | 1.16% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 0.21% | 6.00% | 3.78% | 4.90% | -5.49% | -1.09% | 4.70% | 4.98% | 1.34% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSHBX and BSV is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007 | 0.64 |
The correlation between FSHBX and BSV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSHBX vs. BSV — Risk / Return Rank
FSHBX
BSV
FSHBX vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSHBX | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.53 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 8.35 | +2.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSHBX vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSHBX drawdown since its inception was -8.80%, roughly equal to the maximum BSV drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHBX and BSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSHBX | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.80% | -8.54% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.17% | -1.29% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.17% | -1.53% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.36% | -8.54% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.51% | -8.54% | +2.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.70% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -0.97% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.31% | 0.39% | -0.08% |
Volatility
FSHBX vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) has a higher volatility of 0.65% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares (BSV) at 0.59%. This indicates that FSHBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSHBX | BSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.65% | 0.59% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.45% | 1.33% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96% | 1.82% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.22% | 2.73% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.86% | 2.38% | -0.52% |
FSHBX vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSHBX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSHBX vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
FSHBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than BSV's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund ETF Shares | 4.00% | 3.83% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
FSHBX Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund | 4.18% | 4.26% | 4.00% | 3.00% | 0.83% | 1.04% | 2.62% | 2.13% | 1.78% | 1.27% | 1.12% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSHBX and BSV have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSHBX has higher volatility (0.65%) compared to BSV (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHBX dropped -8.80% vs BSV's -8.54%.
BSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSHBX and BSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer